Eleven game elements for female nonadaptive gamification courses
- PMID: 36632100
- PMCID: PMC9826861
- DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12699
Eleven game elements for female nonadaptive gamification courses
Abstract
Based on the HEXAD framework, this study examines the size of female gamification user types and explores universal game elements for developing nonadaptive courses. A HEXAD scale questionnaire completed from 309 female university students. Data analysis was completed using frequency measures and the one-way ANOVA test. The dominant user types and universal game elements related to content, learning activities, and assessment were identified. The study found that game elements of challenge, choice, collection, competition, customisation, guild, leader board, level, lottery, prize, and voting have the highest preference amongst female students according to their gamification user types. When designing courses for female students, designers must focus on the most preferred game elements to improve the engagement of the gamification environment by female students. The study also showed that most female students were philanthropists and disruptors, whereas socializers and achievers were the smallest minority. Philanthropists play for a purpose, and in the context of the study sample, the purpose could be personal need or academic goals. Results were discussed in the light of self-determination theory and personality traits of female university students. Research implications indicate how the findings may be significant for faculties, instructional designers and internal auditing committees in higher education institutions.
Keywords: Female students; Game elements; Gamification Hexad user type; Nonadaptive learning; Online learning.
© 2022 The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Gamification of e-learning in higher education: a systematic literature review.Smart Learn Environ. 2023;10(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s40561-023-00227-z. Epub 2023 Jan 31. Smart Learn Environ. 2023. PMID: 40478066 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Who likes to learn new things? How Gamification User Types and Satisfaction but not the frustration of basic psychological needs explain the preference for learning new things.Acta Psychol (Amst). 2023 Jun;236:103925. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.103925. Epub 2023 Apr 26. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2023. PMID: 37116268
-
Integrating gamification and instructional design to enhance usability of online learning.Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2023;28(2):2187-2206. doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11202-5. Epub 2022 Aug 15. Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2023. PMID: 35992365 Free PMC article.
-
Psychometric investigation of the gamification Hexad user types scale in Brazilian Portuguese.Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 22;12(1):4920. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08820-x. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 35318375 Free PMC article.
-
Gamification of health professions education: a systematic review.Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2021 May;26(2):683-711. doi: 10.1007/s10459-020-10000-3. Epub 2020 Oct 31. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2021. PMID: 33128662 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Gartner (n.d.). In Gartner. https://www.gartner.com/en/marketing/glossary/gamification.
-
- Chiu T.K.F., Hew T.K.F. Factors influencing peer learning and performance in MOOC asynchronous online discussion forum. Australas. J. Educ. Technol. 2018;34(4) doi: 10.14742/ajet.3240. - DOI
-
- Altmeyer M., Schubhan M., Krüger A., Lessel P. 2021. A Long-Term Investigation on the Effects of (Personalized) Gamification on Course Participation in a Gym. ArXiv, abs/2107.12597.
-
- Monterrat B., Lavoué E., George S. 2015, November. Toward an Adaptive Gamification System for Learning Environments. - DOI
-
- Andrade G., Ramalho G., Gomes A., Corruble V. 2006. pp. 3–8. (Dynamic Game Balancing: An Evaluation of User Satisfaction).
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources