Particle size influences decay rates of environmental DNA in aquatic systems
- PMID: 36633071
- DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.13751
Particle size influences decay rates of environmental DNA in aquatic systems
Abstract
Environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis is a powerful tool for remote detection of target organisms. However, obtaining quantitative and longitudinal information from eDNA data is challenging, requiring a deep understanding of eDNA ecology. Notably, if the various size components of eDNA decay at different rates, and we can separate them within a sample, their changing proportions could be used to obtain longitudinal dynamics information on targets. To test this possibility, we conducted an aquatic mesocosm experiment in which we separated fish-derived eDNA components using sequential filtration to evaluate the decay rate and changing proportion of various eDNA particle sizes over time. We then fit four alternative mathematical decay models to the data, building towards a predictive framework to interpret eDNA data from various particle sizes. We found that medium-sized particles (1-10 μm) decayed more slowly than other size classes (i.e., <1 and > 10 μm), and thus made up an increasing proportion of eDNA particles over time. We also observed distinct eDNA particle size distribution (PSD) between our Common carp and Rainbow trout samples, suggesting that target-specific assays are required to determine starting eDNA PSDs. Additionally, we found evidence that different sizes of eDNA particles do not decay independently, with particle size conversion replenishing smaller particles over time. Nonetheless, a parsimonious mathematical model where particle sizes decay independently best explained the data. Given these results, we suggest a framework to discern target distance and abundance with eDNA data by applying sequential filtration, which theoretically has both metabarcoding and single-target applications.
Keywords: ddPCR; degradation; eDNA ecology; modelling; monitoring; removal rates.
© 2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Suspended Materials Affect Particle Size Distribution and Removal of Environmental DNA in Flowing Waters.Environ Sci Technol. 2023 Sep 5;57(35):13161-13171. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c02638. Epub 2023 Aug 23. Environ Sci Technol. 2023. PMID: 37610829
-
Environmental DNA (eDNA) removal rates in streams differ by particle size under varying substrate and light conditions.Sci Total Environ. 2023 Dec 10;903:166469. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166469. Epub 2023 Aug 24. Sci Total Environ. 2023. PMID: 37633388
-
The particle size distribution of environmental DNA varies with species and degradation.Sci Total Environ. 2021 Nov 25;797:149175. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149175. Epub 2021 Jul 20. Sci Total Environ. 2021. PMID: 34303977
-
Utilizing the state of environmental DNA (eDNA) to incorporate time-scale information into eDNA analysis.Proc Biol Sci. 2023 May 31;290(1999):20230979. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2023.0979. Epub 2023 May 31. Proc Biol Sci. 2023. PMID: 37253423 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Environmental conditions influence eDNA persistence in aquatic systems.Environ Sci Technol. 2014;48(3):1819-27. doi: 10.1021/es404734p. Epub 2014 Jan 21. Environ Sci Technol. 2014. PMID: 24422450 Review.
Cited by
-
Pond Water eDNA Reflects Broad Consistency with Surrounding Terrestrial Plant Ecosystems.Biology (Basel). 2025 Jan 13;14(1):62. doi: 10.3390/biology14010062. Biology (Basel). 2025. PMID: 39857293 Free PMC article.
-
Simultaneous species detection and discovery with environmental DNA metabarcoding: A freshwater mollusk case study.Ecol Evol. 2024 Feb 16;14(2):e11020. doi: 10.1002/ece3.11020. eCollection 2024 Feb. Ecol Evol. 2024. PMID: 38371866 Free PMC article.
-
Revealing Elasmobranch Distributions in Turbid Coastal Waters: Insights From Environmental DNA and Particle Tracking.Ecol Evol. 2025 Jan 24;15(1):e70857. doi: 10.1002/ece3.70857. eCollection 2025 Jan. Ecol Evol. 2025. PMID: 39867497 Free PMC article.
-
Differential decay of multiple environmental nucleic acid components.Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 23;15(1):26791. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-12916-5. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40702224 Free PMC article.
-
Larger particle size distribution of environmental RNA compared to environmental DNA: a case study targeting the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene in zebrafish (Danio rerio) using experimental aquariums.Naturwissenschaften. 2024 Mar 19;111(2):18. doi: 10.1007/s00114-024-01904-w. Naturwissenschaften. 2024. PMID: 38502308
References
REFERENCES
-
- Agrawal, Y. C., & Pottsmith, H. C. (2000). Instruments for particle size and settling velocity observations in sediment transport. Marine Geology, 168(1-4), 89-114.
-
- Andruszkiewicz, A. E., Zhang, W. G., Lavery, A. C., & Govindarajan, A. F. (2021). Environmental DNA shedding and decay rates from diverse animal forms and thermal regimes. Environmental DNA, 3(2), 492-514.
-
- Barnes, M. A., Chadderton, W. L., Jerde, C. L., Mahon, A. R., Turner, C. R., & Lodge, D. M. (2021). Environmental conditions influence eDNA particle size distribution in aquatic systems. Environmental DNA, 3(3), 643-653.
-
- Barnes, M. A., & Turner, C. R. (2016). The ecology of environmental DNA and implications for conservation genetics. Conservation Genetics, 17, 1-17.
-
- Baudry, T., Mauvisseau, Q., Goût, J. P., Arqué, A., Delaunay, C., Smith-Ravin, J., Sweet, M., & Grandjean, F. (2021). Mapping a super-invader in a biodiversity hotspot, an eDNA-based success story. Ecological Indicators, 126, 107637.
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials