Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan-Feb;30(1):5-13.
doi: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000691.

Patient Outcomes Based on the 2011 CDC Guidelines for Field Triage of Injured Patients

Antonio R Fernandez  1 , Scott S Bourn, Garrett D Hall, Remle P Crowe, J Brent Myers
Affiliations

Patient Outcomes Based on the 2011 CDC Guidelines for Field Triage of Injured Patients

Antonio R Fernandez et al. J Trauma Nurs. 2023 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Background: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guidelines for Field Triage of Injured Patients drive the destination decision for millions of emergency medical services (EMS)-transported trauma patients annually, yet limited information exists regarding performance and relationship with patient outcomes as a whole.

Objective: To evaluate the association of positive findings on Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guidelines for Field Triage of Injured Patients with hospitalization and mortality.

Methods: This retrospective study included all 911 responses from the 2019 ESO Data Collaborative research dataset with complete Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guidelines for Field Triage of Injured Patients and linked emergency department dispositions, excluding children and cardiac arrests prior to EMS arrival. Patients were categorized by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guidelines for Field Triage of Injured Patients step(s) met. Outcomes were hospitalization and emergency department or inhospital mortality.

Results: There were 86,462 records included: n = 65,967 (76.3%) met no criteria, n = 16,443 (19.0%) met one step (n = 1,571 [9.6%] vitals, n = 1,030 [6.3%] anatomy of injury, n = 993 [6.0%] mechanism of injury, and n = 12,849 [78.1%] special considerations), and n = 4,052 (4.7%) met multiple. Compared with meeting no criteria, hospitalization odds increased threefold for vitals (odds ratio [OR]: 3.07, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.77-3.40), fourfold for anatomy of injury (OR: 3.94, 95% CI: 3.48-4.46), twofold for mechanism of injury (OR: 2.00, 95% CI: 1.74-2.29), or special considerations (OR: 2.46, 95% CI: 2.36-2.56). Hospitalization odds increased ninefold when positive in multiple steps (OR: 8.97, 95% CI: 8.37-9.62). Overall, n = 84,473 (97.7%) had mortality data available, and n = 886 (1.0%) died. When compared with meeting no criteria, mortality odds increased 10-fold when positive in vitals (OR: 9.58, 95% CI: 7.30-12.56), twofold for anatomy of injury (OR: 2.34, 95% CI: 1.28-4.29), or special considerations (OR: 2.10, 95% CI: 1.71-2.60). There was no difference when only positive for mechanism of injury (OR: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.03-1.54). Mortality odds increased 23-fold when positive in multiple steps (OR: 22.7, 95% CI: 19.7-26.8).

Conclusions: Patients meeting multiple Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guidelines for Field Triage of Injured Patients steps were at greater risk of hospitalization and death. When meeting only one step, anatomy of injury was associated with greater risk of hospitalization; vital sign criteria were associated with greater risk of mortality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Alter S. M., Infinger A., Swanson D., Studnek J. R. (2017). Evaluating clinical care in the prehospital setting: Is Rapid Emergency Medicine Score the missing metric of EMS? The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 35(2), 218–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2016.10.047 - DOI
    1. Brown J. B., Forsythe R. M., Stassen N. A., Peitzman A. B., Billiar T. R., Sperry J. L., Gestring M. L. (2014). Evidence-based improvement of the National Trauma Triage Protocol: The Glasgow Coma Scale versus Glasgow Coma Scale motor subscale. The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 77(1), 95–102; discussion 101–102. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000000280 - DOI
    1. Crowe R. P., Bourn S. S., Fernandez A. R., Myers J. B. (2022). Initial Prehospital Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS) as a predictor of patient outcomes. Prehospital Emergency Care, 26(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2020.1862944 - DOI
    1. Deeb A. P., Phelos H. M., Peitzman A. B., Billiar T. R., Sperry J. L., Brown J. B. (2021a). Making the call in the field: Validating emergency medical services identification of anatomic trauma triage criteria. The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 90(6), 967–972. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000003168 - DOI
    1. Deeb A. P., Phelos H. M., Peitzman A. B., Billiar T. R., Sperry J. L., Brown J. B. (2021b). The whole is greater than the sum of its parts: GCS versus GCS-motor for triage in geriatric trauma. Journal of Surgical Research, 261, 385–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2020.12.051 - DOI