Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 Mar;34(1):98-133.
doi: 10.1007/s11065-022-09574-z. Epub 2023 Jan 12.

Far Transfer Effects of Trainings on Executive Functions in Neurodevelopmental Disorders: A Systematic Review and Metanalysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Far Transfer Effects of Trainings on Executive Functions in Neurodevelopmental Disorders: A Systematic Review and Metanalysis

Clara Bombonato et al. Neuropsychol Rev. 2024 Mar.

Abstract

Executive Functions are a set of interrelated, top-down processes essential for adaptive goal-directed behaviour, frequently impaired across different neurodevelopmental disorders with variable degrees of severity. Many executive-function-training studies in children with neurodevelopmental disorders have focused on near effects, investigating post-treatment improvements on directly trained processes, while enhancements of skills not directly trained, defined as far effects, are less considered, albeit these could be extremely relevant for reducing the negative impact of a disorder's core symptomatology. This systematic review and metanalysis aims to investigate the far effect outcomes after EF training in children with different types of neurodevelopmental disorders. 17 studies met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review, while 15 studies were selected in the metanalysis. An overall statistically significant effect size was found in the majority of far effect outcome measures considered in the studies. In particular, trainings on executive functions determine significant far effects on daily life functioning (0.46, 95% CI: [0.05-0.87]) and clinical symptoms (0.33, 95% CI: [0.15-0.51]). Despite a high variability of the results, intensity, frequency and the laboratory/life contexts dimension seem to be the most influential variables in determining far effects. This systematic review and metanalysis highlights the need to measure far effects of executive function training in neurodevelopmental disorders, selecting treatments not only on directly targeted processes, but also according to far impacts on the functional weakness of the disorder.

Keywords: Children; Executive functions; Far effect; Neurodevelopmental disorders.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study selection process following the PRISMA 2009 flow diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Metanalysis results of far effect on other executive functions
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Metanalysis results of far effect on clinical symptoms
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Metanalysis results of far effect on learning skills
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Metanalysis results of far effect on cognitive measures
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Metanalysis results of far effect on daily life functioning

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alloway TP, Alloway RG. Investigating the predictive roles of working memory and IQ in academic attainment. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 2010;106(1):20–29. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2009.11.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Altemeier LE, Abbott RD, Berninger VW. Executive functions for reading and writing in typical literacy development and dyslexia. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 2008;30(5):588–606. doi: 10.1080/13803390701562818. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andrés-Roqueta C, Garcia-Molina I, Flores-Buils R. Association between CCC-2 and Structural Language, Pragmatics, Social Cognition, and Executive Functions in Children with Developmental Language Disorder. Children. 2021;8(2):123. doi: 10.3390/children8020123. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arns M, de Ridder S, Strehl U, Breteler M, Coenen A. Efficacy of neurofeedback treatment in ADHD: The effects on inattention, impulsivity and hyperactivity: A meta-analysis. Clinical EEG and Neuroscience. 2009;40(3):180–189. doi: 10.1177/155005940904000311. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arrington CN, Kulesz PA, Francis DJ, Fletcher JM, Barnes MA. The Contribution of Attentional Control and Working Memory to Reading Comprehension and Decoding. Scientific Studies of Reading. 2014;18(5):325–346. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2014.902461. - DOI - PMC - PubMed