Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 23:31:101054.
doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2022.101054. eCollection 2023 Feb.

Decision making for invasive and non-invasive optional procedures within an acute HIV research cohort in Bangkok

Affiliations

Decision making for invasive and non-invasive optional procedures within an acute HIV research cohort in Bangkok

Sinéad Isaacson et al. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Clinical research regularly includes required, nontherapeutic procedures to answer research questions. Optional procedures usually offer minimal or no personal benefit and may involve harms and burdens. Members from the Bangkok SEARCH010/RV254 HIV research cohort of individuals acutely HIV-infected are recruited to six optional procedures varying in invasiveness: leukapheresis, genital secretions collection, lumbar puncture, brain MRI/MRS/DTI, colon biopsy, and lymph node biopsy. We surveyed cohort members about their first recruitment for each procedure to examine factors associated with decision making and attitudes about compensation. 406 members (68%) completed the survey. Reported procedure participation ranged from 71% (MRI) to 27% (lymph node biopsy). Respondents underwent 0-6 procedure types (median 3). Ordinal regression indicated that lower perceived HIV impact and HIV remission trial participation were associated with more procedures completed. Reports of decision difficulty varied, and feeling pressured by research staff was low overall. Notably, those who declined procedures and those who underwent more invasive procedures reported greater decision difficulty and perceived pressure. Most respondents felt compensation amounts were appropriate, although opinions differed by procedure, and for some procedures, between people who agreed and declined. There is limited literature regarding consent to and attitudes about optional research procedures. Researchers must consider how to best support voluntary decisions for procedures with little personal benefit, particularly in lower-income or marginalized populations. In this longitudinal research cohort, perceived pressure to participate may be a concern, although our finding of variation in participation rates corresponding to invasiveness is reassuring. Data from different research contexts would provide important comparators.

Keywords: Clinical research ethics; Decision-making; HIV research; Optional procedures; Research biopsies; Research cohorts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Reported participation in optional procedure types (n = 406).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Self-reported number of optional procedure types done by respondents (n = 406).

References

    1. Kimmelman J., Resnik D.B., Peppercorn J., Ratain M.J. Burdensome research procedures in trials: why less is more. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2017;109:djw315. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw315. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dominguez D., Jawara M., Martino N., Sinaii N., Grady C. Commonly performed procedures in clinical research: a benchmark for payment. Contemp. Clin. Trials. 2012;33:860–868. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.05.001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kimmelman J., Lemmens T., Kim S.Y.H. Analysis of consent validity for invasive, nondiagnostic research procedures. IRB. 2012;34:1–7. - PubMed
    1. Abadie R., Kimmelman J., Lafleur J., Lemmens T. Consent for nondiagnostic research biopsies: a pilot study of participant recall and therapeutic orientation. IRB. 2014;36:9–15. - PubMed
    1. Helft P.R., Daugherty C.K. Are we taking without giving in return? The ethics of research-related biopsies and the benefits of clinical trial participation. J. Clin. Oncol. 2006;24:4793–4795. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.05.7125. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources