Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 5:16:37-45.
doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S394255. eCollection 2023.

The Diagnostic Value of Blood Next-Generation Sequencing in Early Surgical Site Infection After Spine Surgery

Nan Zhang  1 , Lei Ma  1 , Wenyuan Ding  1
Affiliations

The Diagnostic Value of Blood Next-Generation Sequencing in Early Surgical Site Infection After Spine Surgery

Nan Zhang et al. Int J Gen Med. .

Abstract

Objective: To determine the diagnostic value of blood next-generation sequencing (NGS) in early surgical site infection after spine surgery. Because the blood is sterile in healthy individuals, it is expected that blood NGS is both sensitive and specific for the detection of infection.

Methods: A total of 28 patients with definitive spinal surgical site infections and controls (n=30) were retrospectively included. The postoperative results of NGS and culture on different samples, such as blood and drainage fluid, were obtained and compared to evaluate the diagnostic value of blood NGS. The diagnostic value parameters (sensitivity, specificity, etc.) were calculated.

Results: Among the four bacteriological exam methods, blood NGS was both sensitive and specific for the determination of infection after spine surgery. The sensitivities of blood and drainage fluid NGS were similar (0.82 vs 0.89, P=0.617). However, the specificities of the two assessments differed, which were 0.97 for blood NGS and 0.40 for drainage fluid NGS (P<0.001). The sensitivities of bacterial culture were lower than those of NGS (blood: 0.82 vs 0.25, P<0.001; drainage fluid: 0.89 vs 0.61, P<0.001), regardless of the sample type. However, the specificities of bacterial culture were equal to or higher than those of NGS (blood: 0.97 vs 0.97, P=1.000; drainage fluid: 0.40 vs 0.80, P=0.002).

Conclusion: This article emphasizes the superiority of blood NGS in infection detection and bacterial determination in patients undergoing spine surgery. Compared with traditional drainage fluid bacterial culture and NGS, blood NGS was more sensitive and specific, and its extensive application could be expected.

Keywords: diagnostic test; next-generation sequencing; spine surgery; surgical site infection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All the authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Elsarrag M, Soldozy S, Patel P, et al. Enhanced recovery after spine surgery: a systematic review. Neurosurg Focus. 2019;46(4):E3. doi:10.3171/2019.1.FOCUS18700 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arif S, Brady Z, Enchev Y, Peev N. Is fusion the most suitable treatment option for recurrent lumbar disc herniation? A systematic review. Neurol Res. 2020;42(12):1034–1042. doi:10.1080/01616412.2020.1787661 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Castillo H, Chintapalli RTV, Boyajian HH, et al. Lumbar discectomy is associated with higher rates of lumbar fusion. Spine J. 2019;19(3):487–492. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2018.05.016 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dower A, Chatterji R, Swart A, Winder MJ. Surgical management of recurrent lumbar disc herniation and the role of fusion. J Clin Neurosci. 2016;23:44–50. doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2015.04.024 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aleem IS, Tan LA, Nassr A, Riew KD. Surgical site infection prevention following spine surgery. Global Spine J. 2020;10(1 Suppl):92s–98s. doi:10.1177/2192568219844228 - DOI - PMC - PubMed