Laparoscopic versus open in right posterior sectionectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 36637531
- DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-02764-0
Laparoscopic versus open in right posterior sectionectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Erratum in
-
Correction to: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Journal.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Feb 16;408(1):92. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02824-5. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023. PMID: 36792843 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is now widely adopted for the treatment of liver tumors due to its minimally invasive advantages. However, multicenter, large-sample population-based laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy (LRPS) has rarely been reported. We aimed to assess the advantages and drawbacks of right posterior sectionectomy compared with laparoscopic and open surgery by meta-analysis.
Methods: Relevant literature was searched using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Ovid Medline, and Web of Science databases up to September 12, 2021. Quality assessment was performed based on a modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The data were analyzed by Review Manager 5.3. The data were calculated by odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for fixed-effects and random-effects models.
Results: The meta-analysis included seven studies involving 739 patients. Compared with open right posterior sectionectomy (ORPS), the LRPS group had lower intraoperative blood loss (MD - 135.45; 95%CI - 170.61 to - 100.30; P < 0.00001) and shorter postoperative hospital stays (MD - 2.17; 95% CI - 3.03 to - 1.31; P < 0.00001). However, there were no statistically significant differences between LRPS and ORPS regarding operative time (MD 44.97; P = 0.11), pedicle clamping (OR 0.65; P = 0.44), clamping time (MD 2.72; P = 0.31), transfusion rate (OR 1.95; P = 0.25), tumor size (MD - 0.16; P = 0.13), resection margin (MD 0.08; P = 0.63), R0 resection (OR 1.49; P = 0.35), recurrence rate (OR 2.06; P = 0.20), 5-year overall survival (OR 1.44; P = 0.45), and 5-year disease-free survival (OR 1.07; P = 0.88). Furthermore, no significant difference was observed in terms of postoperative complications (P = 0.08), bile leakage (P = 0.60), ascites (P = 0.08), incisional infection (P = 0.09), postoperative bleeding (P = 0.56), and pleural effusion (P = 0.77).
Conclusions: LRPS has an advantage in the length of hospital stay and blood loss. LRPS is a very useful technology and feasible choice in patients with the right posterior hepatic lobe tumor.
Keywords: Hepatectomy; Laparoscopic; Meta-analysis; Right posterior sectionectomy.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Safety and feasibility for laparoscopic versus open caudate lobe resection: a meta-analysis.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 Aug;406(5):1307-1316. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-02055-y. Epub 2021 Jan 6. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021. PMID: 33404881
-
The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy vs. open approach: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Front Surg. 2022 Oct 17;9:1019117. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1019117. eCollection 2022. Front Surg. 2022. PMID: 36325043 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Laparoscopic versus open right posterior sectionectomy: an international, multicenter, propensity score-matched evaluation.Surg Endosc. 2021 Nov;35(11):6139-6149. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08109-y. Epub 2020 Nov 2. Surg Endosc. 2021. PMID: 33140153 Free PMC article.
-
Laparoscopic hepatectomy versus open hepatectomy for tumors located in right posterior segment: A single institution study.Asian J Surg. 2022 Jan;45(1):110-116. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.03.024. Epub 2021 Apr 15. Asian J Surg. 2022. PMID: 33863627
-
Laparoscopic left lateral hepatic sectionectomy was expected to be the standard for the treatment of left hepatic lobe lesions: A meta-analysis.Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Feb;97(7):e9835. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009835. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018. PMID: 29443745 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Laparoscopic versus open repeat liver resection for recurrent liver cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Updates Surg. 2025 Aug 12. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02276-0. Online ahead of print. Updates Surg. 2025. PMID: 40796708 Review.
References
-
- Llovet JM, Bruix J (2008) Novel advancements in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma in 2008. J Hepatol 48(Suppl 1):S20-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2008.01.022 - PubMed
-
- Reich H, McGlynn F, DeCaprio J, Budin R (1991) Laparoscopic excision of benign liver lesions. Obstet Gynecol 78(5 Pt 2):956–958 - PubMed
-
- Yang TH, Chen JL, Lin YJ, Chao YJ, Shan YS, Hsu HP, Su ZM, Chou CC, Yen YT (2018) Laparoscopic surgery for large left lateral liver tumors: safety and oncologic outcomes. Surg Endosc 32(10):4314–4320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6287-9 - PubMed
-
- Belli G, Fantini C, D’Agostino A, Belli A, Cioffi L, Russolillo N (2006) Laparoscopic left lateral hepatic lobectomy: a safer and faster technique. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 13(2):149–154 - PubMed
-
- Cho HD, Kim KH, Hwang S, Ahn CS, Moon DB, Ha TY, Song GW, Jung DH, Park GC, Lee SG (2018) Comparison of pure laparoscopic versus open left hemihepatectomy by multivariate analysis: a retrospective cohort study. Surg Endosc 32(2):643–650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5714-7 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical