Association between in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer and hearing loss: risk factors for hearing loss among twin infants in a cohort study
- PMID: 36637539
- DOI: 10.1007/s00431-022-04767-3
Association between in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer and hearing loss: risk factors for hearing loss among twin infants in a cohort study
Abstract
Assisted reproductive technologies (ART), including in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), are known to contribute a higher risk of birth defects; however, studies have rarely evaluated the association between IVF-ET and diagnostic hearing loss (HL). This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of and risk factors for HL and to clarify the association between IVF-ET and HL among twinborn infants. We enrolled 1860 live-born twin neonates born at a hospital in China from January 2017 to December 2020. After multi-step hearing screening, participants were diagnosed with HL by pediatric audiologists at 6 months of age. The prevalence of hearing loss and the adjusted odds ratios (AORs) for specific risk factors were estimated using generalized estimation equation (GEE) models in twin-born infants. Characteristics and prevalence of failure for hearing screening and HL were measured in IVF-ET twin infants. IVF-ET conception and preterm birth conferred a higher risk of hearing loss, with increased adjusted odds ratios (AOR [95% confidence intervals (CI)] IVF-ET: 2.82 [1.17-6.80], P = 0.021; preterm birth: 6.14 [2.30-16.40], P < 0.001) than the control group, respectively. Among the 1860 twin infants, more IVF-ET twins failed in dual-step hearing screening (3.26%) and were diagnosed with hearing loss (2.21%) than those conceived by spontaneous pregnancy.
Conclusion: IVF-ET conception and premature birth were associated with a higher risk of hearing impairment. Twin infants conceived by IVF-ET tended to fail in hearing screening and be diagnosed with hearing loss. These observations provide a more comprehensive approach for the prevention and management of deafness in twin-born children.
What is known: • IVF-ET technologies conferred a higher risk of birth defects.
What is new: • Premature birth and IVF-ET conception were associated with a higher risk of hearing loss among twin infants. • Twin infants conceived by IVF-ET tended to fail in hearing screening and diagnosed with hearing loss.
Keywords: Hearing loss; Hearing screening; In vitro fertilization-embryo transfer; Risk factors; Twin infants.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Neonatal outcome and congenital malformations in children born after ICSI with testicular or epididymal sperm: a controlled national cohort study.Hum Reprod. 2013 Jan;28(1):230-40. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des377. Epub 2012 Nov 15. Hum Reprod. 2013. PMID: 23154066
-
Comparative study on risk for birth defects among infants after in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection.Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2019 Feb;65(1):54-60. doi: 10.1080/19396368.2018.1554012. Epub 2018 Dec 10. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2019. PMID: 30526119
-
Perinatal complications and live-birth outcomes following assisted reproductive technology: a retrospective cohort study.Chin Med J (Engl). 2019 Oct 20;132(20):2408-2416. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000484. Chin Med J (Engl). 2019. PMID: 31634242 Free PMC article.
-
Preterm birth in singleton pregnancies conceived by in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection: an overview of systematic reviews.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Nov;231(5):501-515.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.05.037. Epub 2024 May 23. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024. PMID: 38796038 Review.
-
Risk of spontaneous preterm birth in singleton pregnancies conceived after IVF/ICSI treatment: meta-analysis of cohort studies.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jan;51(1):43-53. doi: 10.1002/uog.18930. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018. PMID: 29114987 Review.
References
-
- Vander Borght M, Wyns C (2018) Fertility and infertility: definition and epidemiology. Clin Biochem 62:2–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.03.012 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Jiang Z, Wang Y, Lin J, Xu J, Ding G, Huang H (2017) Genetic and epigenetic risks of assisted reproduction. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 44:90–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2017.07.004 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Davies MJ, Rumbold AR, Moore VM (2017) Assisted reproductive technologies: a hierarchy of risks for conception, pregnancy outcomes and treatment decisions. J Dev Orig Health Dis 8:443–447. https://doi.org/10.1017/s2040174417000526 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Garcia JE, Rosenwaks Z (2018) Development of in vitro fertilization in the United States: a conversation between Zev Rosenwaks and Jairo E. Garcia Fertil Steril 110:14–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.04.011 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical