Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Dec;121(4):280-284.

Does a Change in Physician Compensation Lead to Changes in Care Delivery in Family Medicine Clinics?

Affiliations
Review

Does a Change in Physician Compensation Lead to Changes in Care Delivery in Family Medicine Clinics?

Jennifer Lochner et al. WMJ. 2022 Dec.

Abstract

Background and objectives: Many highly capitated systems still pay physicians based on relative value units (RVU), which may lead to excessive office visits. We reviewed electronic health records from the family medicine clinic panel members of 97 physicians and 42 residents to determine if a change from RVUs to panel-based compensation influenced care delivery as defined by the number of office visits and telephone contacts per panel member per month.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of the electronic health records of patients seen in 4 residency training clinics, 10 community clinics, and 4 regional clinics was conducted. We assessed face-to-face care delivery and telephone call volume for the clinics individually and for the clinics pooled by clinic type from 1 year before to at least 1 year after the change.

Results: Change in physician compensation was not found to have an effect on office visits or telephone calls per panel member per month when pooled by clinic categories. Some significant effects were seen in individual clinics without any clear patterns by clinic size or type.

Conclusions: Change in physician compensation was not a key driver of care delivery in family medicine clinics. Understanding changes in care delivery may require looking at a broad array of system, physician, and patient factors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosure: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Interrupted Time Series Study Design. Change in level = b2; change in slope (post minus pre) = b3.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Office Visits per Panel Member per Month
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Telephone Calls per Panel Member per Month
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
b2 and b3 Results for Office Visits per Panel Member per Month
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
b2 and b3 Results for Telephone Calls per Panel Member per Month

References

    1. Brekke KR, Holmås TH, Monstad K, Straume OR. Do treatment decisions depend on physicians’ financial incentives? Journal of Public Economics. 2017;155:74–92. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2017.09.012 - DOI
    1. Gosden T, Forland F, Kristiansen IS, et al. Capitation, salary, fee-for-service and mixed systems of payment: effects on the behaviour of primary care physicians. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(3):CD002215. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lyu H, Xu T, Brotman D, et al. Overtreatment in the United States. PLoS One. 2017;12(9):e0181970. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mitchell JM. Urologists’ use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(17):1629–1637. - PubMed
    1. Reid RO, Tom AK, Ross RM, Duffy EL, Damberg CL. Physician Compensation Arrangements and Financial Performance Incentives in US Health Systems. JAMA Health Forum. 2022;3(1):e214634-e214634. doi:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.4634 - DOI - PMC - PubMed