Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2023 Mar:282:55-60.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.12.029. Epub 2023 Jan 4.

A novel obstetrical surgical intervention - New episiotomy: Case series study

Affiliations
Observational Study

A novel obstetrical surgical intervention - New episiotomy: Case series study

Adam Ostrzenski. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2023 Mar.

Abstract

Objectives: To establish anatomical structures responsible for creating a resistance force on a fetal head during vaginal delivery at term; to develop a new episiotomy to widen the vaginal outlet.

Design: A prospective observational case series study.

Setting: International centers.

Population: Eighteen consecutive women at term during vaginal delivery.

Methods: V-shape excision made on the hymeneal membrane, hymeneal ring, and hymeneal plate without extending an incision to the posterior perineal structures. Outlectorrhaphy (repairing the vaginal outlet to repair the surgical defect. Excisional specimens are subjected to histological examinations.

Main outcome measures: The primary maternal outcome measures were postpartum posterior perineum pain associated with vaginal outlectomy. The secondary outcomes measured a) complication of vaginal outlectomy; b) occurrence of dyspareunia after vaginal outlectomy; c) applicability of vaginal outlectomy; d) neonatal outcome measured by an APGAR score to show how the neonate tolerated the vaginal delivery process with vaginal outlectomy implementation.

Results: The V-shape excision widened the vaginal outlet sufficiently for a vaginal delivery without a perineal incision. Outlectorrhaphy requires two or three simple interrupted sutures to close surgical defects and eliminate the vaginal gapping appearance. Eleven out of eighteen women were primigravida (61.1 %), and four multiparas (38.9 %) delivered a live newborn vaginally with a newly developed vaginal outlectomy. A median newborn's weight was 350 g ± 250 g, and APGAR scores at 5 min were median of 9 ± 1. One out of eighteen patients experienced extension of the skin, perineal fascia, and bulbospongiosus muscle. Bleeding from the extension tearing of vaginal outlectomy was heavier than from uncomplicated vaginal outlectomy but negligible. Immediately postpartum, patients reported no moderate or severe perineal pain. At a 3-month postpartum, none of the subjects reported superficial or deep dyspareunia. Histology from the vaginal outlectomy specimens described the direct connection of the longitudinal vaginal smooth muscles to the hymeneal plate and compact connective tissues (like cartilage) of the hymeneal ring. Additionally, the histological examination showed the absence of the perineal skeletal muscle within the vaginal outlectomy specimens.

Conclusions: The vaginal outlet is responsible for the most vital resistance force on a fetal head during delivery. Vaginal outlectomy widens the vaginal outlet sufficiently for a fetal vaginal birth with minimal bleeding and is easy to repair. No moderate-severe perineal pain or dyspareunia occurred in this study group.

Tweetable abstract: Vaginal outlectomy eliminates postpartum moderate-to-severe perineal pain and superficial dyspareunia. The posterior perineum creates no resistance force on the fetal head during vaginal delivery to warrant incision.

Keywords: Episiotomy; Obstetric anal sphincter injury; Perineal laceration at birth; Spontaneous vaginal delivery; Vaginal introitus; Vaginal outlectomy; Vaginal outlet anatomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources