Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jan;35(1):241-249.
doi: 10.1111/jerd.12993. Epub 2023 Jan 13.

A guide for maximizing the accuracy of intraoral digital scans: Part 2-Patient factors

Affiliations
Review

A guide for maximizing the accuracy of intraoral digital scans: Part 2-Patient factors

Marta Revilla-León et al. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2023 Jan.

Abstract

Objectives: To describe the factors related to patient intraoral conditions that impact the scanning accuracy of intraoral scanners (IOSs). A new classification for these influencing factors is proposed to facilitate dental professionals' decision-making and maximize the accuracy and reliability of intraoral digital scans.

Overview: Variables related to intraoral conditions of the patient that can influence the scanning accuracy of IOSs include tooth type, presence of interdental spaces, arch width variations, palate characteristics, wetness, existing restorations, characteristics of the surface being digitized, edentulous areas, interimplant distance, position, angulation, and depth of existing implants, and implant scan body selection.

Conclusions: The knowledge and understanding of the patient's intraoral conditions that can impact the scanning accuracy of IOSs is a fundamental element for maximizing the accuracy of IOSs.

Clinical significance: The patient's intraoral conditions, or patient factors, can significantly impact intraoral scanning accuracy. Dental professionals must know and understand these influencing patient factors to maximize the accuracy of IOSs.

Keywords: accuracy; digital impressions; digital scans; esthetic dentistry; influencing factor; intraoral scanners; operator factors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

REFERENCES

    1. Revilla-Leon M, Frazier K, da Costa JB, et al. Council on scientific affairs. Intraoral scanners: an American dental association clinical evaluators panel survey. J Am Dent Assoc. 2021;152(8):669-70.e2.
    1. Son K, Lee KB. Effect of tooth types on the accuracy of dental 3d scanners: an in vitro study. Materials (Basel). 2020;13(7):1744.
    1. Chun JH, Tahk JH, Chun YS, Park JM, Kim M. Analysis on the accuracy of intraoral scanners: the effects of mandibular anterior interdental space. Appl Sci. 2017;7:719.
    1. Huang MY, Son K, Lee KB. Effect of distance between the abutment and the adjacent teeth on intraoral scanning: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;125(6):911-917.
    1. Son SA, Kim JH, Seo DG, et al. Influence of different inlay configurations and distance from the adjacent tooth on the accuracy of an intraoral scan. J Prosthet Dent. 2022;128(4):680-687.

Substances

LinkOut - more resources