A guide for maximizing the accuracy of intraoral digital scans: Part 2-Patient factors
- PMID: 36639916
- DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12993
A guide for maximizing the accuracy of intraoral digital scans: Part 2-Patient factors
Abstract
Objectives: To describe the factors related to patient intraoral conditions that impact the scanning accuracy of intraoral scanners (IOSs). A new classification for these influencing factors is proposed to facilitate dental professionals' decision-making and maximize the accuracy and reliability of intraoral digital scans.
Overview: Variables related to intraoral conditions of the patient that can influence the scanning accuracy of IOSs include tooth type, presence of interdental spaces, arch width variations, palate characteristics, wetness, existing restorations, characteristics of the surface being digitized, edentulous areas, interimplant distance, position, angulation, and depth of existing implants, and implant scan body selection.
Conclusions: The knowledge and understanding of the patient's intraoral conditions that can impact the scanning accuracy of IOSs is a fundamental element for maximizing the accuracy of IOSs.
Clinical significance: The patient's intraoral conditions, or patient factors, can significantly impact intraoral scanning accuracy. Dental professionals must know and understand these influencing patient factors to maximize the accuracy of IOSs.
Keywords: accuracy; digital impressions; digital scans; esthetic dentistry; influencing factor; intraoral scanners; operator factors.
© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Similar articles
-
A guide for maximizing the accuracy of intraoral digital scans. Part 1: Operator factors.J Esthet Restor Dent. 2023 Jan;35(1):230-240. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12985. Epub 2022 Dec 7. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2023. PMID: 36479807 Review.
-
A guide for selecting the intraoral scan extension when fabricating tooth- and implant-supported fixed dental prostheses.J Esthet Restor Dent. 2024 Jan;36(1):85-93. doi: 10.1111/jerd.13143. Epub 2023 Oct 3. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2024. PMID: 37789708 Review.
-
Intraoral digital implant scans: Parameters to improve accuracy.J Prosthodont. 2023 Dec;32(S2):150-164. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13749. Epub 2023 Sep 8. J Prosthodont. 2023. PMID: 37586762 Review.
-
Classification of Complete-Arch Implant Scanning Techniques Recorded by Using Intraoral Scanners.J Esthet Restor Dent. 2025 Jan;37(1):236-243. doi: 10.1111/jerd.13322. Epub 2024 Sep 27. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2025. PMID: 39329344 Review.
-
The current clinical relevancy of intraoral scanners in implant dentistry.Dent Mater J. 2020 Jan 31;39(1):57-61. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2019-285. Epub 2019 Nov 14. Dent Mater J. 2020. PMID: 31723067 Review.
Cited by
-
Trueness evaluation of three intraoral scanners for the recording of maximal intercuspal position.Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2024 Apr 1;42(2):227-233. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2024.2023277. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2024. PMID: 38597082 Free PMC article. Chinese, English.
-
Photogrammetry Versus Intraoral Scanning in Complete-Arch Digital Implant Impression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025 Jun;27(3):e70059. doi: 10.1111/cid.70059. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025. PMID: 40481748 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The influence maximization algorithm for integrating attribute graph clustering and heterogeneous graph transformer.Heliyon. 2024 Oct 4;10(21):e38916. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38916. eCollection 2024 Nov 15. Heliyon. 2024. PMID: 39524763 Free PMC article.
-
Kennedy class III and IV dental arches: Trueness analysis of digitization methods and 3D-printing step.Braz Dent J. 2024 Dec 6;35:e245980. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440202405980. eCollection 2024. Braz Dent J. 2024. PMID: 40136133 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating the accuracy of CEREC intraoral scanners for inlay restorations: impact of adjacent tooth materials.BMC Oral Health. 2024 Sep 3;24(1):1033. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04794-6. BMC Oral Health. 2024. PMID: 39227885 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Revilla-Leon M, Frazier K, da Costa JB, et al. Council on scientific affairs. Intraoral scanners: an American dental association clinical evaluators panel survey. J Am Dent Assoc. 2021;152(8):669-70.e2.
-
- Son K, Lee KB. Effect of tooth types on the accuracy of dental 3d scanners: an in vitro study. Materials (Basel). 2020;13(7):1744.
-
- Chun JH, Tahk JH, Chun YS, Park JM, Kim M. Analysis on the accuracy of intraoral scanners: the effects of mandibular anterior interdental space. Appl Sci. 2017;7:719.
-
- Huang MY, Son K, Lee KB. Effect of distance between the abutment and the adjacent teeth on intraoral scanning: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;125(6):911-917.
-
- Son SA, Kim JH, Seo DG, et al. Influence of different inlay configurations and distance from the adjacent tooth on the accuracy of an intraoral scan. J Prosthet Dent. 2022;128(4):680-687.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources