Cross-sectional study evaluating the association of haemophilia-related distress and clinically relevant outcomes
- PMID: 36639952
- DOI: 10.1111/hae.14741
Cross-sectional study evaluating the association of haemophilia-related distress and clinically relevant outcomes
Abstract
Introduction: In chronic diseases, disease-related distress can impact disease outcomes. Distress and haemophilia-related distress has been demonstrated in people with haemophilia (PwH). The association of haemophilia-related distress on disease outcomes among PwH is unknown.
Aim: To study the association of haemophilia-related distress with haemophilia specific outcomes, including adherence to prophylactic therapy, the presence of a target joint, healthcare utilization and work-impairment.
Methods: In a cross-sectional study, adults with haemophilia A or B were enrolled in a study to validate the haemophilia-related distress questionnaire (HRDq). In this planned analysis, univariate and multivariate associations between the HRDq total score and disease outcomes were explored.
Results: The 114 participants in this analysis were male, mostly with haemophilia A (92%) and severe disease (52%) with a median age of 31.9 years. On univariate analysis, HRDq total score (5-point change) was associated with the presence of a target joint (P = .002), high healthcare utilization (P = .011), poor adherence (P = .033) and work-impairment (P ≤ .001). After adjustment for age, race, severity and other potential confounders, adherence (aβ 0.33, 95% CI .17, .49) and work-impairment (aβ 4.69, 95% CI 3.27-6.1) remained statistically significantly associated with HRDq total score.
Conclusion: Haemophilia-related distress is associated with poor adherence to factor prophylaxis and work-impairment. The direction of the association (causation) is yet to be determined and requires future study.
Keywords: haemophilia; hemarthrosis; medication adherence; psychological distress.
© 2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Buttorff C, Ruder T, Bauman M. Multiple Chronic Conditions in the United States. RAND Corporation; 2017.
-
- Barry V, Stout ME, Lynch ME, et al. The effect of psychological distress on health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. J Health Psychol. 2020;25(2):227-239.
-
- Pandit AU, Bailey SC, Curtis LM, et al. Disease-related distress, self-care and clinical outcomes among low-income patients with diabetes. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014;68(6):557-564.
-
- Cavazza M, Kodra Y, Armeni P, et al. Social/economic costs and quality of life in patients with haemophilia in Europe. Eur J Health Econ. 2016;17(Suppl 1):53-65.
-
- Barry V, Lynch ME, Tran DQ, et al. Distress in patients with bleeding disorders: a single institutional cross-sectional study. Haemophilia. 2015;21(6):e456-464.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
