Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1987 May-Jun;23(3):223-6.

Nasal occlusion during sleep in normal and near-miss for sudden death syndrome infants

Affiliations
  • PMID: 3664013

Nasal occlusion during sleep in normal and near-miss for sudden death syndrome infants

D O Rodenstein et al. Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir. 1987 May-Jun.

Abstract

Obligatory nasal breathing has been suggested in the past as a contributor to sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS): nasal obstruction would result in death as infants were unable to breathe orally. To test this hypothesis, we studied 55 normal and 14 near-miss for SIDS infants during a whole-night polysomnography. On several occasions, the infant nares were gently occluded by the fingertips of the investigator. Infants continued to make respiratory efforts against the occluded nose for a variable time (apnoea time), then opened the mouth and started to breathe through it. Mean apnoea time in normal infants was 4.76 +/- 3.41 s (means +/- SD), and 6.54 +/- 4.25 s in near-miss for SIDS ones. These figures were not significantly different. Analysis according to sleep stage (quiet sleep: 4.08 +/- 3.24 s in normals and 6.50 +/- 4.18 s in near-miss for SIDS ones; active sleep: 6.54 +/- 3.67 s in normals and 6.58 +/- 4.76 s in near-miss for SIDS ones) did not disclose any significant difference between groups. There was no significant relationship between apnoea time and age in either group. In many cases, an arousal preceded the resumption of (oral) flow. However, in almost half of the occlusions, oral breathing was initiated during continuing sleep. We conclude: 1) infants are not obligatory nasal breathers, and 2) the nasal obstruction hypothesis should be discarded in the etiology of SIDS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources