Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb;24(2):187-194.
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00750-1. Epub 2023 Jan 11.

Hemicolectomy versus appendectomy for patients with appendiceal neuroendocrine tumours 1-2 cm in size: a retrospective, Europe-wide, pooled cohort study

Cédric Nesti  1 Konstantin Bräutigam  2 Marta Benavent  3 Laura Bernal  3 Hessa Boharoon  4 Johan Botling  5 Antonin Bouroumeau  6 Iva Brcic  7 Maximilian Brunner  8 Guillaume Cadiot  9 Maria Camara  10 Emanuel Christ  11 Thomas Clerici  12 Ashley K Clift  13 Hamish Clouston  14 Lorenzo Cobianchi  15 Jarosław B Ćwikła  16 Kosmas Daskalakis  17 Andrea Frilling  13 Rocio Garcia-Carbonero  18 Simona Grozinsky-Glasberg  19 Jorge Hernando  20 Valérie Hervieu  21 Johannes Hofland  22 Pernille Holmager  23 Frediano Inzani  24 Henning Jann  25 Paula Jimenez-Fonseca  26 Enes Kaçmaz  27 Daniel Kaemmerer  28 Gregory Kaltsas  17 Branislav Klimacek  29 Ulrich Knigge  30 Agnieszka Kolasińska-Ćwikła  31 Walter Kolb  12 Beata Kos-Kudła  32 Catarina Alisa Kunze  33 Stefania Landolfi  34 Stefano La Rosa  35 Carlos López López  36 Kerstin Lorenz  37 Maurice Matter  38 Peter Mazal  39 Claudia Mestre-Alagarda  40 Patricia Morales Del Burgo  41 Els J M Nieveen van Dijkum  27 Kira Oleinikov  19 Lorenzo A Orci  42 Francesco Panzuto  43 Marianne Pavel  44 Marine Perrier  9 Henrik Mikael Reims  45 Guido Rindi  46 Anja Rinke  47 Maria Rinzivillo  48 Xavier Sagaert  49 Ilker Satiroglu  37 Andreas Selberherr  50 Alexander R Siebenhüner  51 Margot E T Tesselaar  52 Michael J Thalhammer  53 Espen Thiis-Evensen  54 Christos Toumpanakis  4 Timon Vandamme  55 José G van den Berg  56 Alessandro Vanoli  57 Marie-Louise F van Velthuysen  58 Chris Verslype  59 Stephan A Vorburger  60 Alessandro Lugli  2 John Ramage  61 Marcel Zwahlen  62 Aurel Perren  2 Reto M Kaderli  63
Affiliations

Hemicolectomy versus appendectomy for patients with appendiceal neuroendocrine tumours 1-2 cm in size: a retrospective, Europe-wide, pooled cohort study

Cédric Nesti et al. Lancet Oncol. 2023 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Awareness of the potential global overtreatment of patients with appendiceal neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) of 1-2 cm in size by performing oncological resections is increasing, but the rarity of this tumour has impeded clear recommendations to date. We aimed to assess the malignant potential of appendiceal NETs of 1-2 cm in size in patients with or without right-sided hemicolectomy.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we pooled data from 40 hospitals in 15 European countries for patients of any age and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status with a histopathologically confirmed appendiceal NET of 1-2 cm in size who had a complete resection of the primary tumour between Jan 1, 2000, and Dec 31, 2010. Patients either had an appendectomy only or an appendectomy with oncological right-sided hemicolectomy or ileocecal resection. Predefined primary outcomes were the frequency of distant metastases and tumour-related mortality. Secondary outcomes included the frequency of regional lymph node metastases, the association between regional lymph node metastases and histopathological risk factors, and overall survival with or without right-sided hemicolectomy. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the relative all-cause mortality hazard associated with right-sided hemicolectomy compared with appendectomy alone. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03852693.

Findings: 282 patients with suspected appendiceal tumours were identified, of whom 278 with an appendiceal NET of 1-2 cm in size were included. 163 (59%) had an appendectomy and 115 (41%) had a right-sided hemicolectomy, 110 (40%) were men, 168 (60%) were women, and mean age at initial surgery was 36·0 years (SD 18·2). Median follow-up was 13·0 years (IQR 11·0-15·6). After centralised histopathological review, appendiceal NETs were classified as a possible or probable primary tumour in two (1%) of 278 patients with distant peritoneal metastases and in two (1%) 278 patients with distant metastases in the liver. All metastases were diagnosed synchronously with no tumour-related deaths during follow-up. Regional lymph node metastases were found in 22 (20%) of 112 patients with right-sided hemicolectomy with available data. On the basis of histopathological risk factors, we estimated that 12·8% (95% CI 6·5 -21·1) of patients undergoing appendectomy probably had residual regional lymph node metastases. Overall survival was similar between patients with appendectomy and right-sided hemicolectomy (adjusted hazard ratio 0·88 [95% CI 0·36-2·17]; p=0·71).

Interpretation: This study provides evidence that right-sided hemicolectomy is not indicated after complete resection of an appendiceal NET of 1-2 cm in size by appendectomy, that regional lymph node metastases of appendiceal NETs are clinically irrelevant, and that an additional postoperative exclusion of metastases and histopathological evaluation of risk factors is not supported by the presented results. These findings should inform consensus best practice guidelines for this patient cohort.

Funding: Swiss Cancer Research foundation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests MBe reports funding from Novartis, Pfizer, and Ipsen; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speaker bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Novartis, Pfizer, Ipsen, and Advanced Accelerator Applications (AAA); support for attending meetings or travel from Novartis, Pfizer, and Ipsen; and participation on data safety monitoring board or advisory boards from Pfizer and AAA. IB reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speaker bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS) and Bayer Vital and support for attending meetings or travel for European Musculo-Skeletal Oncology Society 2022 conference from PharmaMar. RG-C reports funding of investigator-initiated clinical trials from Pfizer, BMS, and MSD, and an real-world data project from Servier; consulting fees from AAA/Novartis, Advanz Pharma, Amgen, Bayer, BMS, Boehringer (Ingelheim), Esteve, Hutchmed, Ipsen, Merck, Midatech Pharma, MSD, PharmaMar, and Pierre Fabre; and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speaker bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Roche. GC reports grants or contracts from AAA; consulting fees from AAA; payments or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speaker bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AAA, Ipsen, and Keocyt; and support for attending meetings or travel from AAA, Ipsen, and Keocyt. MPa reports payments for advisory boards or lectures from AAA and Novartis; payments for advisory boards, consultancy, or lectures from Ipsen; payment for lectures from Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD, Lilly, and Recordati; payment for advisory boards from Riemser; payment for services (radiological review of phase 3 study) from Hutchmed; payment for travel for participation in study steering committee meeting from Rayzebio; payment to institution from Crinetics and AAA; and unpaid roles as ENETS vice president, European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Education Committee, ESMO scientific steering committee NET track, advisor on the International Neuroendocrine Cancer Alliance board, and advisor for German patient support group. GR reports payments for speaker bureaus from AAA. AR reports being an ENETS Advisory Board member. TV reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speaker bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Ipsen; support for attending meetings or travel from Ipsen; and an unpaid position as secretary in the Dutch Belgian Neuroendocrine Tumor Society. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Comment in

Publication types

Supplementary concepts

Associated data