Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 14;23(1):33.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09025-2.

Equity and efficiency of medical and health service system in China

Affiliations

Equity and efficiency of medical and health service system in China

Na Zhao et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Equity and efficiency are basic value dimensions to evaluate the effectiveness of China's medical and health service system (MHS) reform and development. Coordinated development of equity and efficiency is necessary to realize high-quality development of medical and health services. This study aims to evaluate the equity, efficiency, and combined efforts in coordinating the MHS during 1991-2020 reform.

Methods: Data on China's MHS were obtained from the China Statistical Yearbook 1992-2021. Ratios of urban to rural residents' medical expenditure and number of medical professionals per 10,000 people were employed to evaluate MHS's equity. The data envelopment analysis-Malmquist model was employed to evaluate MHS's efficiency. We constructed a combined-efforts-in-coordination model to examine the coordination degree between equity and efficiency.

Results: Equity of medical expenditure burden significantly improved from during 1991-2007. Urban residents' 1991 medical expenditure burden was 87.8% of that of rural residents, which increased to 100.1% in 2007. Urban areas' mean medical expenditure burden was 105.94% of that in rural areas during 1991-2007. The gap in equity of medical expenditure burden between urban and rural areas slowly widened after 2007, with urban areas' mean burden being 68.52% of that in rural areas during 2007-2020. Medical and health resources allocation shows an alarming inequity during this period, with mean number of medical professionals per 10,000 people in urban areas being 238.30% of that in rural areas. Efficiency experienced several fluctuations before 2008. Since 2008, efficiency was high (0.915) and remained stable, except in 2020. The combined-efforts-in-coordination score for medical expenditure burden was less than 0.2 for 80% of the years, while that for in medical and health resources was more than 0.5 for 99.67% of the years.

Conclusions: MHS inequity remains between urban and rural China, primarily because of disproportionate allocation of medical and health resources. The government should enhance rural medical professionals' salary and welfare and provide medical subsidies for rural residents to adjust resource allocation levels in urban and rural areas, control differences in medical expenditure burden between urban and rural residents to a reasonable range, and continuously improve urban and rural residents' equity level.

Keywords: China; Coordination index; Efficiency; Equity; Medical and health services system.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Illustration of the concept of combined efforts in coordination of equity-efficiency development
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Equity trends of China’s medical and health service system

References

    1. Jin H, Qian X. How the Chinese government has done with public health from the perspective of the evaluation and comparison about public-health expenditure. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:9272. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249272. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shi L. Health care in China: A rural-urban comparison after the socioeconomic reforms. Bull World Health Organ. 1993;71:723–736. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liu Y. Development of the rural health insurance system in China. Health Policy Plan. 2004;19:159–165. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czh019. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Li L, Fu H. China’s health care system reform: Progress and prospects. Int J Health Plan Manage. 2017;32:240–253. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2424. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yip W, Fu H, Chen AT, Zhai T, Jian W, Xu R, et al. 10 years of health-care reform in China: Progress and gaps in universal health coverage. Lancet. 2019;394:1192–1204. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32136-1. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources