Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 16;24(1):2.
doi: 10.1186/s40510-022-00453-0.

Predictability of orthodontic tooth movement with aligners: effect of treatment design

Tommaso Castroflorio  1 , Ambra Sedran  2 , Simone Parrini  3 , Francesco Garino  4 , Matteo Reverdito  5 , Riccardo Capuozzo  6 , Sabrina Mutinelli  7 , Simonas Grybauskas  8 , Mantas Vaitiekūnas  9 , Andrea Deregibus  1
Affiliations

Predictability of orthodontic tooth movement with aligners: effect of treatment design

Tommaso Castroflorio et al. Prog Orthod. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Backgrounds: The present study was designed to define: (1) which are the less predictable OTM with Invisalign aligners when the treatment plan is designed by expert operators, (2) if the presence and shape of attachments influence the predictability of OTM and (3) if patients' demographics influence OTM predictability. The sample comprises 79 prospectively recruited patients (mean age 30.8 years; SD 12.0; 23 M, 56 F), treated by expert operators with an average of 27 aligners (SD 15) in the maxillary arch and 25 aligners (SD 11) in the mandibular arch. Post-treatment digital models and final virtual treatment plan models were exported from ClinCheck® software as STL files and subsequently imported into Geomagic Qualify ®software, to compare final teeth positions. The differences were calculated and tested for statistical significance for each tooth in the mesial-distal, vestibular-lingual and occlusal-gingival directions, as well as for angulation, inclination and rotation. In addition, the statistical significance of categorical variables was tested.

Results: The lack of correction was significant for all movements and in all group of teeth (P < 0.01) except for the rotation of maxillary first molar. The prescribed OTM, the group of teeth and movement, the frequency of aligner change and the use of attachment influence the outcome. The greatest discrepancies in predicted and achieved tooth position were found for angular movements and rotation of teeth characterized by round-shaped crowns, for a ratio of approximately 0.4° per 1° prescribed. Optimized attachments for upper canines and lower premolar rotation seem not working properly. Second molar movements are mostly unexpressed. Furthermore, changing the aligner every 14 days will reduce the lack of correction of the 12% with respect to 7 days aligner change.

Conclusions: Predictability of orthodontic movement with aligners still has limitations related to the biomechanics of the system: the shape of some attachments and the characteristics of aligner material need to be redefined. However, the results of this study allow to properly design the virtual treatment plan, revealing how much overcorrection is needed and which attachments are most effective.

Keywords: Attachments; Clear aligners; Orthodontic tooth movement; Treatment design.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

TC, SP, FG, MR and RC declare that they have financial and non-financial competing interests with Align Technology, outside of the present study. The other authors declare that they do not have any competing interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A Overlay performed by the landmark-based method; B Overlay performed by the surface-based method (best-fit alignment) using a best-fit algorithm
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Coronal (A), occlusal (B), median (C) reference planes
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Kau CH, Richmond S, Palomo JM, Hans MG. Three-dimensional cone beam computerized tomography in orthodontics. J Orthod. 2005;32:282–293. doi: 10.1179/146531205225021285. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Al Mortadi N, Jones Q, Eggbeer D, Lewis J, Williams RJ. Fabrication of a resin appliance with alloy components using digital technology without an analog impression. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015;148(5):862–867. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.06.014. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rossini G, Parrini S, Castroflorio T, Deregibus A, Debernardi CL. Diagnostic accuracy and measurement sensitivity of digital models for orthodontic purposes: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016;149:161–170. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.06.029. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Werneck EC, Mattos FS, Da Silva MG, et al. Evaluation of the increase in orthodontic treatment demand in adults. Braz Dent Sci. 2012;15:47. doi: 10.14295/bds.2012.v15i1.738. - DOI
    1. American Association of Orthodontists’ “Economics of Orthodontics”. Dental Tribune of America, 29 April 2016. https://us.dental-tribune.com/news/adults-are-seeking-orthodontic-treatm.... Accessed 28 May 2021.

LinkOut - more resources