Continuous voriconazole lavage in managing moderate and severe fungal keratitis: a randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 36642766
- DOI: 10.1007/s00417-022-05969-z
Continuous voriconazole lavage in managing moderate and severe fungal keratitis: a randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the effectiveness and safety of continuous lavage with 1% voriconazole (CL) for moderate and severe fungal keratitis.
Methods: Thirty-one patients were randomized to receive topical eye drops either alone (T) or combined with continuous 1% voriconazole lavage (CL-T). The primary outcome was the cure rate at 3 months. The secondary outcomes were the 6-day efficacy, 3-day infiltration size and depth, hypopyon height, central corneal thickness (CCT), epithelial defect size, and subject feelings and clinical signs assessment scores.
Results: At 3 months, the cure rate was comparable between the groups in patients with moderate fungal keratitis (66.7% vs. 62.5%, P = 0.60). However, among severe cases, 4 cases (44.4%) in the CL-T group healed successfully, while none in the T group; this difference was not significant (P = 0.08), although it was very close to 0.05. This may be related to the small sample size. After 6 days, the percentage of patients with "worsened" ulcers in the CL-T group was lower than that in the T group (0% vs. 31%, P = 0.043). The infiltration size, infiltration depth, and hypopyon height in the CL-T group were smaller than those in the T group after 3 days (all P < 0.05). There was no difference in CCT, epithelial defect size, subject feelings scores, or clinical signs scores between groups.
Conclusion: These outcomes suggest that CL is an effective and safe adjuvant method for controlling the progression of moderate and severe fungal keratitis.
Trial registration number: ChiCTR2100050565.
Keywords: Continuous lavage; Effectiveness; Fungal keratitis; Safety.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Austin A, Lietman T, Rose-Nussbaumer J (2017) Update on the management of infectious keratitis. Ophthalmol 124(11):1678–1689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.05.012 - DOI
-
- Lalitha P, Prajna NV, Kabra A et al (2006) Risk factors for treatment outcome in fungal keratitis. Ophthalmol 113(4):526–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.10.063 - DOI
-
- Prajna NV, Krishnan T, Mascarenhas J et al (2013) The mycotic ulcer treatment trial: a randomized trial comparing natamycin vs voriconazole. JAMA Ophthalmol 131(4):422–429. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.1497 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Prajna NV, Krishnan T, Rajaraman R et al (2016) Effect of oral voriconazole on fungal keratitis in the Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trial II (MUTT II): a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol 134(12):1365–1372. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.4096 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Narayana S, Krishnan T, Ramakrishnan S et al (2019) Mycotic antimicrobial localized injection: a randomized clinical trial evaluating intrastromal injection of voriconazole. Ophthalmol 126(8):1084–1089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.03.020 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
