Allelic to genome wide perspectives of swine genetic variation to litter size and its component traits
- PMID: 36642776
- DOI: 10.1007/s11033-022-08168-5
Allelic to genome wide perspectives of swine genetic variation to litter size and its component traits
Abstract
Litter size is a complex and sex limited trait that depends on various biological, managemental and environmental factors. Owing to its low heritability it is inefficaciously selected by traditional methods. However, due to higher heritability of ovulation rate and embryo survival, selection based on component traits of litter size is advocated. QTL analysis and candidate gene approach are among the various supplementary/alternate strategies for selection of litter size. QTL analysis is aimed at identifying genomic regions affecting trait of interest significantly. Candidate gene approach necessitates identification of genes potentially affecting the trait. There are various genes that significantly affect litter size and its component traits viz. ESR, LEP, BF, IGFBP, RBP4, PRLR, CTNNAL1, WNT10B, TCF12, DAZ, and RNF4. These genes affect litter size in a complex interacting manner. Lately, genome wide association study (GWAS) have been utilized to unveil the genetic and biological background of litter traits, and elucidate the genes governing litter size. Favorable SNPs in these genes have been identified and offers a scope for inclusion in selection programs thereby increasing breeding efficiency and profit in pigs. The review provides a comprehensive coverage of investigations carried out globally to unravel the genetic variation in litter size and its component traits in pigs, both at allelic and genome wide level. It offers a current perspective on different strategies including the profiling of candidate genes, QTLs, and genome wide association studies as an aid to efficient selection for litter size and its component traits.
Keywords: Candidate gene approach; Genome wide association study; Litter size; Number born alive; QTL analysis; Total number born.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.
References
-
- Noguera JL, Rodriguez C, Varona L, Tomas A, Munoz G, Ramirez O, Barragan C, Arque M, Bidanel JP, Amills M, Ovilo C (2009) A bi-dimensional genome scan for prolificacy traits in pigs shows the existence of multiple epistatic QTL. BMC Genomics 10:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-10-636 - DOI
-
- Mills KM, Schinckel AP, Stevens JG, Casey TM, Stewart KR (2020) Evaluation of on farm indicators of gilt reproductive performance potential at 21 days of age. Transl Anim Sci 4:210. https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txaa210 - DOI
-
- Sanchez-Davila F, Bernal-Barragan H, Padilla-Rivas G, Del Bosque-González AS, Vázquez-Armijo JF, Ledezma-Torres RA (2015) Environmental factors and ram influence litter size, birth, and weaning weight in Saint Croix hair sheep under semi-arid conditions in Mexico. Trop Anim Health Prod 47:825–831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-015-0795-6 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Argente MJ (2016) Major components in limiting litter size. In: Payan Carreira R (ed) Insights from animal reproduction. InTech, London, pp 87–114
-
- Pope WF (1994) Embryonic mortality in swine. Embryonic Mortal Domest Species 53:77
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
