Demand-avoid-withdraw processes in adolescent dating aggression
- PMID: 36645870
- DOI: 10.1002/ab.22070
Demand-avoid-withdraw processes in adolescent dating aggression
Abstract
We conducted an observational study of a collection of interactive processes known as "demand-withdraw" in relation to adolescent dating aggression. Couples (N = 209) aged 14-18 years participated in a challenging observational laboratory assessment to measure demands (i.e., pressures for a change), as well as demand → partner withdraw and demand → partner avoid sequences. Actor and partner effects were disentangled via dyadic data analyses. The results indicated a fairly consistent pattern in which demand → withdraw and demand → avoid sequences led by either partner were positively associated with both partners' physical and psychological aggression (measured via a dual informant questionnaire method). Further, higher quality demands (i.e., pressures for change that were specific and encouraged both members of the dyad to increase a given behavior) were inversely associated with aggression. Yet, all of the above associations were attenuated to the point of statistical nonsignificance after controlling for hostility. These results suggest two primary possibilities. The associations of demand → withdraw and demand → avoid sequences with dating aggression may be spurious, with the sequences merely markers for hostility, a known correlate of dating aggression. Alternatively, hostility may mediate the relations of demand → withdraw and demand → avoid sequences with dating aggression. Further research is required to test these competing explanations. Implications for preventive intervention are discussed.
Keywords: adolescence; aggression; behavior observation; dating violence; demand-withdraw.
© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Babcock, J. C., Waltz, J., Jacobson, N. S., & Gottman, J. M. (1993). Power and violence: The relation between communication patterns, power discrepancies, and domestic violence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61(1), 40-50. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006x.61.1.40
-
- Bailen, N. H., Green, L. M., & Thompson, R. J. (2018). Understanding emotion in adolescents: A review of emotional frequency, intensity, instability, and clarity. Emotion Review, 11(1), 63-73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073918768878
-
- Baucom, B. R., & Atkins, D. C. (2013). Understanding marital distress: Polarization processes. In M. A. Fine, & F. D. Fincham (Eds.), Handbook of family theories: A content-based approach (pp. 145-166). Routledge.
-
- Berns, S. B., Jacobson, N. S., & Gottman, J. M. (1999). Demand-withdraw interaction in couples with a violent husband. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(5), 666-674. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006x.67.5.666
-
- Bonache, H., Gonzalez-Mendez, R., & Krahé, B. (2017). Romantic attachment, conflict resolution styles, and teen dating violence victimization. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(9), 1905-1917. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0635-2
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical