Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2023 May;49(3):274-287.
doi: 10.1002/ab.22070. Epub 2023 Jan 16.

Demand-avoid-withdraw processes in adolescent dating aggression

Affiliations
Observational Study

Demand-avoid-withdraw processes in adolescent dating aggression

Michael F Lorber et al. Aggress Behav. 2023 May.

Abstract

We conducted an observational study of a collection of interactive processes known as "demand-withdraw" in relation to adolescent dating aggression. Couples (N = 209) aged 14-18 years participated in a challenging observational laboratory assessment to measure demands (i.e., pressures for a change), as well as demand → partner withdraw and demand → partner avoid sequences. Actor and partner effects were disentangled via dyadic data analyses. The results indicated a fairly consistent pattern in which demand → withdraw and demand → avoid sequences led by either partner were positively associated with both partners' physical and psychological aggression (measured via a dual informant questionnaire method). Further, higher quality demands (i.e., pressures for change that were specific and encouraged both members of the dyad to increase a given behavior) were inversely associated with aggression. Yet, all of the above associations were attenuated to the point of statistical nonsignificance after controlling for hostility. These results suggest two primary possibilities. The associations of demand → withdraw and demand → avoid sequences with dating aggression may be spurious, with the sequences merely markers for hostility, a known correlate of dating aggression. Alternatively, hostility may mediate the relations of demand → withdraw and demand → avoid sequences with dating aggression. Further research is required to test these competing explanations. Implications for preventive intervention are discussed.

Keywords: adolescence; aggression; behavior observation; dating violence; demand-withdraw.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Babcock, J. C., Waltz, J., Jacobson, N. S., & Gottman, J. M. (1993). Power and violence: The relation between communication patterns, power discrepancies, and domestic violence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61(1), 40-50. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006x.61.1.40
    1. Bailen, N. H., Green, L. M., & Thompson, R. J. (2018). Understanding emotion in adolescents: A review of emotional frequency, intensity, instability, and clarity. Emotion Review, 11(1), 63-73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073918768878
    1. Baucom, B. R., & Atkins, D. C. (2013). Understanding marital distress: Polarization processes. In M. A. Fine, & F. D. Fincham (Eds.), Handbook of family theories: A content-based approach (pp. 145-166). Routledge.
    1. Berns, S. B., Jacobson, N. S., & Gottman, J. M. (1999). Demand-withdraw interaction in couples with a violent husband. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(5), 666-674. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006x.67.5.666
    1. Bonache, H., Gonzalez-Mendez, R., & Krahé, B. (2017). Romantic attachment, conflict resolution styles, and teen dating violence victimization. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(9), 1905-1917. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0635-2

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources