Periorbital reconstructive techniques following Mohs micrographic surgery or excisions: a systematic review
- PMID: 36646921
- DOI: 10.1007/s00403-022-02523-z
Periorbital reconstructive techniques following Mohs micrographic surgery or excisions: a systematic review
Abstract
There are many articles in the literature on periorbital reconstruction after Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) or surgical excision, however, the literature lacks a comprehensive systematic review of these reports. We performed a systematic review of published data on periorbital defect reconstruction to identify trends in the literature. A comprehensive search of eight databases was performed. To be included in the study, articles had to be published in English between 2005 and 2020 and contain repair data for MMS or excision defects in the periorbital region. Studies with less than four patients, literature or systematic reviews, and abstract-only publications were excluded. Data extracted from eligible articles included the authors' medical specialties, study design, subject number and demographics, defect characteristics, procedure type, reconstructive methods, complications, outcome measures, and method of outcome assessment. 53 studies met the inclusion criteria. The first and last authors' specialties were ophthalmology (47%), plastic and reconstructive surgery (23%), dermatology (13%), otolaryngology (4%), or were multi-specialty collaborations (13%). Only 5 of the studies were prospective. Defects were located on the lower eyelid (55%), medial canthus (31%), upper eyelid (8%), lateral canthus (4%), or a combination of these sites (2%). Reconstructive methods were reported for 3678 cases and included linear repair (18%), advancement flap (8%), rotation flap (5%), transposition flap (3%), island pedicle flap (1%), unspecified local skin flap (21%), skin graft (23%), secondary intention (4%), tarsoconjunctival flap (3%), and combined reconstruction techniques (13%). Thirty-three of 53 articles specified the periorbital subunit for each reconstructive technique that was employed. Among these 33 articles which allowed for correlation between defect location and reconstructive technique, the most utilized repair method for lower eyelid defects was local skin flap. Defects on the upper eyelid or medial canthus were most frequently repaired with a skin graft. Forty articles commented on cosmetic outcomes, however, only 3 of these articles utilized a defined grading system, objective measurements, or independent reviewers to assess the cosmetic outcomes. The methods of reconstruction in this review were diverse, however, local skin flaps and grafts were the most utilized techniques. In future reports, increased reporting of reconstructive technique by defect location as well as increased use of standardized assessments of aesthetic outcomes can help strengthen this body of literature.
Keywords: Eyelid reconstruction; Mohs; Periorbital reconstruction; Skin cancer; Surgery.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Nasal reconstructive techniques following Mohs surgery or excisions: a systematic review.Arch Dermatol Res. 2023 Apr;315(3):333-337. doi: 10.1007/s00403-022-02390-8. Epub 2022 Sep 24. Arch Dermatol Res. 2023. PMID: 36152047
-
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 33075160 Free PMC article.
-
Different types of implants for reconstructive breast surgery.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 16;2016(5):CD010895. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010895.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27182693 Free PMC article.
-
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11701100
-
Surgical orbital decompression for thyroid eye disease.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 7;(12):CD007630. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007630.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011. PMID: 22161415
Cited by
-
Features associated with the use of single or combined reconstructions: analysis of 1,124 Mohs surgeries.An Bras Dermatol. 2025 Mar-Apr;100(2):342-345. doi: 10.1016/j.abd.2024.07.009. Epub 2025 Jan 31. An Bras Dermatol. 2025. PMID: 39893140 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Harvey DT, Taylor RS, Itani KM, Loewinger RJ (2013) Mohs micrographic surgery of the eyelid: an overview of anatomy, pathophysiology, and reconstruction options. Dermatol Surg 39(5):673–697. https://doi.org/10.1111/dsu.12084 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Esteves TC, Catorze MG, Themido R, Labareda JM, Bordalo O, Picoto A (2010) Malignant eyelid tumours treated with Mohs’ micrographic surgery: Review of 22 years. Skin Cancer 25:11–19
-
- Seo YJ, Hwang C, Choi S, Oh SH (2009) Midface reconstruction with various flaps based on the angular artery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67(6):1226–1233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2008.06.097 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ibrahim AMS, Rabie AN, Borud L, Tobias AM, Lee BT, Lin SJ (2014) Common patterns of reconstruction for Mohs defects in the head and neck. J Craniofac Surg 25(1):87–92. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182a2e9eb - DOI - PubMed
-
- Çöloǧlu H, Koçer U, Oruç M, Şahin B, Özdemir R (2007) Axial bilobed superficial temporal artery island flap (tulip flap): reconstruction of combined defects of the lateral canthus including the lower and upper eyelids. Plast Reconstr Surg 119(7):2080–2087. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000260602.32664.ba - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous