Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 16;23(1):37.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08975-3.

Approaches to clinical guideline development in healthcare: a scoping review and document analysis

Annemarie De Leo  1 , Dianne Bloxsome  2 , Sara Bayes  3
Affiliations

Approaches to clinical guideline development in healthcare: a scoping review and document analysis

Annemarie De Leo et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Over the past decade, an industry has emerged around Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) development in healthcare, which has increased pressure on guideline-producing organisations to develop CPGs at an accelerated rate. These are intended to improve the quality of care provided to patients while containing healthcare costs and reducing variability in clinical practice. However, this has inadvertently led to discrepancies in CPG recommendations between health organisations, also challenging healthcare providers who rely on these for decision-making and to inform clinical care. From a global perspective, although some countries have initiated national protocols regarding developing, appraising and implementing high-quality CPGs, there remains no standardised approach to any aspect of CPG production.

Methods: A scoping review of the literature and document analysis were conducted according to Joanna Brigg's Institute methodology for scoping reviews. This comprised two qualitative methods: a comprehensive review of the literature (using CINAHL, Scopus and PubMeD) and a document analysis of all national and international guideline development processes (manual search of health-related websites, national/international organisational health policies and documents).

Results: A set of clear principles and processes were identified as crucial to CPG development, informing the planning, implementation and dissemination of recommendations. Fundamentally, two common goals were reported: to improve the quality and consistency of clinical practice (patient care) and to reduce the duplication or ratification of low-grade CPGs.

Conclusions: Consultation and communication between CPG working parties, including a wide range of representatives (including professional organisations, regional and local offices, and relevant national bodies) is essential. Further research is required to establish the feasibility of standardising the approach and disseminating the recommendations.

Keywords: Clinical Practice Guidelines; Evidence-based medicine; Guideline development; Quality healthcare; Standardisation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Nil.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The most common words used to describe CPG principles
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The most common words used to describe CPG processes
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Kredo T, Bernhardsson S, Machingaidze S, Young T, Louw Q, Ochodo E, et al. Guide to clinical practice guidelines: the current state of play. Int J Qual Health Care. 2016;28(1):122–128. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzv115. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Louw Q, Dizon JM, Grimmer K, McCaul M, Kredo T, Young T. Building capacity for development and implementation of clinical practice guidelines. S Afr Med J. 2017;107(9):745–746. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2017.v107i9.12527. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grol R, Cluzeau FA, Burgers JS. Clinical practice guidelines: towards better quality guidelines and increased international collaboration. Br J Cancer. 2003;89(Suppl 1):S4–8. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601077. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schunemann HJ, Wiercioch W, Etxeandia I, Falavigna M, Santesso N, Mustafa R, et al. Guidelines 2.0: systematic development of a comprehensive checklist for a successful guideline enterprise. CMAJ. 2014;186(3):E123–42. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.131237. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, Burgers JS, Cluzeau F, Feder G, et al. AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care. CMAJ. 2010;182(18):E839–E842. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.090449. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types