Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 16;16(1):3.
doi: 10.1186/s40545-023-00519-2.

Quality analysis of manufacturer's incident reports regarding medical devices

Antonela Simunovic  1 , Krunoslav Kranjcec  2 , Marija Pekas  2 , Siniša Tomic  2
Affiliations

Quality analysis of manufacturer's incident reports regarding medical devices

Antonela Simunovic et al. J Pharm Policy Pract. .

Abstract

Background: Medical devices provide a great number of medical treatments and have an important role in patients' healthcare; however, there are certain risks, sometimes even serious incidents, associated with their usage. To ensure that benefits of medical device usage always outweigh associated risks, it is necessary to closely monitor known risks post-market and detect new ones as early as possible. Among others, valuable instrument of post-market surveillance is manufacturer incident report. Yet to accomplish its intended use, such report must be sufficiently populated and supplied with correct information. Aim of this paper is to assess the quality of manufacturer's incident reports received in HALMED since 2012 to May 2021.

Methods: The study included 578 initial reports and 566 final reports that were scored according to the evaluating system we designed and categorized as Excellent, Good, Medium, Qualified and Unqualified. For each report medical device risk class was also extracted to calculate the frequency of report occurrence per risk class and time that passed between the initial and final report. Difference in quality of the reports between manufacturers based on EU countries and countries outside the EU was determined by Mann Whitney U test.

Results: Most of initial and final reports fall into two highest quality category level, which means that a sufficient amount of reports are of good/excellent quality and quality of reports prevails. However, the study's results indicate the need for higher scores, especially in critical fields of the form.

Conclusions: Data obtained from the manufacturer can be scarce and insufficient, causing negative influence on Competent Authority's investigation procedure. Another issue we recognized is extensive underreporting in Croatia, which can seriously undermine the established system.

Keywords: Benefit to risk ratio; Incident reports; Medical devices; Quality of incident reports.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Percentage of each medical device risk class in reports included in the study
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
a Time passed from initial to the final report; b did the manufacturers met the self-assigned deadline
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Kramer DB, Tan YT, Sato C, Kesselheim AS. Ensuring medical device effectiveness and safety: a cross-national comparison of approaches to regulation. Food Drug Law J. 2014;69(1):1–23. - PMC - PubMed
    1. EUROPEAN COMMISSION. MEDDEV 2 12–1 rev. 8 Vigilance. European Commission. 2013;(July 2013):1–64. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/32305/attachments/1/translations. Accessed 14 Oct 2021.
    1. Zippel C, Bohnet-Joschko S. Post market surveillance in the german medical device sector—current state and future perspectives. Health Policy. 2017;121(8):880–886. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.06.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. European Parliament and of the Council. Directive 98/79/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 October 1998 on in vitro diagnostic medical devices. Official Journal of the European Communities. (October 1998):1–42. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=celex%3A31998L0079. Accessed 14 Oct 2021.
    1. European Parliament and of the Council . Council Directive 90/385/EEC of 20 June 1990 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to active implantable medical devices. Official Journal of the European Communities. (September 2000):1–15. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=celex:31990L0385. Accessed 14 Oct 2021.