Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep;28(3):592-609.
doi: 10.1177/13674935231151748. Epub 2023 Jan 16.

Identifying research priorities with children, youth, and families: A scoping review

Affiliations

Identifying research priorities with children, youth, and families: A scoping review

Shokoufeh Modanloo et al. J Child Health Care. 2024 Sep.

Abstract

Increased patient advocacy has resulted in a shift toward more active patient engagement in the research. A scoping review was conducted to explore the literature on healthcare research priority settings wherein children, youths, or their families were involved in the priority-setting process. Six databases including MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase, Web of Science, and Global Health and the James Lind Alliance website were searched up until September 2019. All primary studies involving children (<18 years of age) or families in developing research priorities in health care were included. All retrieved references were uploaded into Covidence, and two independent reviewers screened the search results. Descriptive thematic analysis was used to identify common themes. A total of 30 studies with 4247 participants were included. Less than half of the participants (n = 1237, (33%) were pediatric patients and their families. A total of 455 research priorities were identified. Three common themes emerged: (i) quality of care delivery, (ii) self-efficacy in health behaviors, and (iii) community engagement in care. This scoping review revealed priority research health topics from the perspectives of children, youths, or their families. The findings may be used as a foundation for future research to improve the health outcomes of children, youths, or their families according to their identified priorities.

Keywords: (MeSH terms) Research; adolescent; child; health priorities; patient participation; patient-centered care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
PRISMA flow chart.

References

    1. Aldiss S, Fern LA, Phillips B, et al. (2018) Top 10 Research Priorities for Teenage and Young Adult Cancer in the United Kingdom: Prioritising Need for Psychosocial Research. Pediatric Blood & Cancer 111: S563–S563. River ST, Hoboken 07030-5774, NJ USA WILEY.
    1. Arksey H, O’Malley L. (2005) Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 8(1): 19–32. Taylor & Francis.
    1. Baker JN, Levine DR, Hinds PS, et al. (2015) Research priorities in pediatric palliative care. The Journal of Pediatrics 167(2): 467–470. Elsevier. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berg AT, Baca CB, Loddenkemper T, et al. (2013) Priorities in pediatric epilepsy research: Improving children's futures today. Neurology 81(13): 1166–1175. AAN Enterprises. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bialy L, Plint AC, Freedman SB, et al. (2018) Pediatric Emergency Research Canada (PERC): Patient/Family‐informed Research Priorities for Pediatric Emergency Medicine. Academic Emergency Medicine 25(12): 1365–1374. Wiley Online Library. - PubMed

Publication types