Protective Efficiency Comparison of Direct and Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Ischemia Reperfusion Injury of the Liver in Patients Undergoing Partial Hepatectomy
- PMID: 36647546
- PMCID: PMC9840547
- DOI: 10.1155/2023/2763320
Protective Efficiency Comparison of Direct and Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Ischemia Reperfusion Injury of the Liver in Patients Undergoing Partial Hepatectomy
Abstract
Objective: Ischemia reperfusion injury greatly damages liver function and deteriorates the prognosis of patients undergoing partial hepatectomy. This study is to compare the protective efficiency of direct and remote ischemic preconditioning (DIPC and RIPC) on ischemia reperfusion injury of the liver in patients undergoing partial hepatectomy.
Methods: 90 patients scheduled for partial hepatectomy were enrolled and randomly divided into control (n = 30), DIPC (n = 30), and RIPC (n = 30) groups. Baseline and surgery characteristics were collected, and ischemic preconditioning methods were carried out. Intraoperative hemodynamics, liver function and liver reserve capacity, oxidative stress, and inflammatory responses were measured, and the incidence of postoperative adverse reactions was calculated finally.
Results: 10 patients were excluded from the study, and finally, the eligible patients in three groups were 27, 28, and 25, separately. No significant differences were observed in baseline and surgery characteristics among the three groups. SBP and DBP were significantly higher after hepatic portal vein occlusion while they were significantly lower after surgery in the DIPC and RIPC groups compared with that in the control group, SBP and DBP were of great fluctuation at different time points in the control group while they showed much more stabilization in the DIPC and RIPC groups. ALT, AST, and TBIL were significantly decreased on days 1, 3, and 5 after surgery, and ICG R15 was significantly decreased while ICG K value and EHBF were significantly increased on day 1 after surgery in the DIPC and RIPC groups compared with that in the control group. Moreover, antioxidant enzyme SOD was increased, and inflammatory factors TNF-α and IL-1β were decreased 24 hours after surgery in the DIPC and RIPC groups compared with that in the control group. DIPC and RIPC also decreased hospital stays and the incidence of nausea, vomiting, and hypertension.
Conclusion: DIPC and RIPC both alleviated ischemia reperfusion injury of the liver and reduced perioperative complications with similar protective efficiency in patients undergoing partial hepatectomy.
Copyright © 2023 Erliang Kong et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that there were no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Effects of remote ischemic preconditioning in hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Mar 26;24(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02506-9. BMC Anesthesiol. 2024. PMID: 38532332 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of the protective effects of direct ischemic preconditioning and remote ischemic preconditioning in a rabbit model of transient spinal cord ischemia.J Anesth. 2018 Feb;32(1):3-14. doi: 10.1007/s00540-017-2420-5. Epub 2017 Nov 1. J Anesth. 2018. PMID: 29094209
-
Remote Ischemic Preconditioning Decreases the Magnitude of Hepatic Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury on a Swine Model of Supraceliac Aortic Cross-Clamping.Ann Vasc Surg. 2018 Apr;48:241-250. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.08.006. Epub 2017 Sep 6. Ann Vasc Surg. 2018. PMID: 28887256
-
Effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury in patients undergoing liver resection: a randomized controlled trial.Minerva Anestesiol. 2020 Mar;86(3):252-260. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.19.13838-2. Epub 2019 Dec 4. Minerva Anestesiol. 2020. PMID: 31808659 Clinical Trial.
-
Remote ischemic preconditioning: a novel protective method from ischemia reperfusion injury--a review.J Surg Res. 2008 Dec;150(2):304-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2007.12.747. Epub 2008 Jan 22. J Surg Res. 2008. PMID: 19040966 Review.
Cited by
-
Effects of Remimazolam-Propofol with Flumazenil Reversal on the Emergence Time and Hemodynamics of Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Partial Hepatectomy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.Drug Des Devel Ther. 2025 Aug 5;19:6777-6787. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S531034. eCollection 2025. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2025. PMID: 40786246 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The Interplay between Perioperative Oxidative Stress and Hepatic Dysfunction after Human Liver Resection: A Prospective Observational Pilot Study.Antioxidants (Basel). 2024 May 11;13(5):590. doi: 10.3390/antiox13050590. Antioxidants (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38790695 Free PMC article.
-
6-Gingerol attenuates hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury through regulating MKP5-mediated P38/JNK pathway.Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 2;14(1):7747. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58392-1. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38565569 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of remote ischemic preconditioning in hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Mar 26;24(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02506-9. BMC Anesthesiol. 2024. PMID: 38532332 Free PMC article.
-
Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes: an emerging therapeutic strategy for hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury.Stem Cell Res Ther. 2025 Apr 14;16(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s13287-025-04302-9. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2025. PMID: 40229893 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Hu J. J., Li C. H., Wang H. D., Xu W. L., Zhang A. Q., Dong J. H. Portal vein clamping alone confers protection against hepatic ischemia- reperfusion injury via preserving hepatocyte function in cirrhotic rats. The Journal of Surgical Research . 2015;194(1):139–146. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.10.003. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical