Piloting HealthScore: Feasibility and acceptability of a clinically integrated health coaching program for people living with cancer
- PMID: 36647557
 - PMCID: PMC10134320
 - DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5625
 
Piloting HealthScore: Feasibility and acceptability of a clinically integrated health coaching program for people living with cancer
Abstract
Background: Cancer supportive care interventions often have limited generalizability, goal misalignment, and high costs. We developed and piloted a health coaching intervention, UNC HealthScore, in patients undergoing cancer treatment (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04923997). We present feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary outcome data.
Methods: HealthScore is a six-month, theory-based, multicomponent intervention delivered through participant-driven coaching sessions. For the pilot study, participants were provided a Fitbit, responded to weekly symptom and physical function digital surveys, and met with a health coach weekly to develop and monitor goals. Coaching notes were discussed in weekly interdisciplinary team meetings and provided back to the treating oncology team. Symptom alerts were monitored and triaged through a study resource nurse to relevant supportive care services. Feasibility was determined based on intervention enrollment and completion. Acceptability was based on satisfaction with coaching and Fitbit-wearing and was informed by semistructured exit interviews. Outcomes evaluated for signs of improvement included several PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) measures, including the primary intervention target, physical function.
Results: From May 2020 to March 2022, 50 participants completed the single-arm pilot. Feasibility was high: 66% enrolled and 71% completed the full intervention. Participants reported an average of 4.8 and 4.7 (out of 5) on the acceptability of coaching calls and using the Fitbit, respectively. Physical function scores rose 3.1 points (SE = 1.1) from baseline to 3 months, and 4.3 (SE = 1.0) from baseline to 6 months, above established minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Improvements above MCID were also evident in anxiety and depression, and smaller improvements were demonstrated for emotional support, social isolation, cognitive function, symptom burden, and self-efficacy.
Discussion: HealthScore shows feasibility, acceptability, and promising preliminary outcomes. Randomized studies are underway to determine the efficacy of preserving physical function in patients with advanced cancer.
Keywords: cancer; health coaching; physical function; pilot; self-efficacy; symptom management; telehealth.
© 2023 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
WAW reports research funding from Pfizer and Genentech, consulting for Teladoc, and is an advisor with equity for Koneksa Health.
Figures
References
- 
    
- Chavan PP, Kedia SK, Yu X. Impact of physical and functional limitations on health care utilization in older cancer survivors: a Medicare current beneficiary survey. J Aging Health. 2020;32:987‐997. - PubMed
 
 - 
    
- Courneya KS, Friedenreich CM, Franco‐Villalobos C, et al. Effects of supervised exercise on progression‐free survival in lymphoma patients: an exploratory follow‐up of the HELP trial. Cancer Causes Control. 2015;26:269‐276. - PubMed
 
 
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
              
              