Efficacy and safety of ciprofol vs. propofol for the induction and maintenance of general anaesthesia: A multicentre, single-blind, randomised, parallel-group, phase 3 clinical trial
- PMID: 36647565
- PMCID: PMC10155686
- DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001799
Efficacy and safety of ciprofol vs. propofol for the induction and maintenance of general anaesthesia: A multicentre, single-blind, randomised, parallel-group, phase 3 clinical trial
Abstract
Background: HSK3486 (ciprofol) is a 2,6-disubstituted phenol derivative that acts like propofol as an agonist at the gamma-aminobutyric acid-A (GABA A ) receptor.
Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of HSK3486 for general anaesthesia induction and maintenance.
Design: A single-blinded, randomised, parallel-group, phase 3 trial.
Setting: Involving 10 study centres, from November 24, 2020 to January 25, 2021.
Patients: A total of 129 patients undergoing nonemergency, noncardiothoracic, and nonneurosurgical elective surgery.
Intervention: Patients were randomly assigned at a 2:1 ratio into HSK3486 or propofol groups, to receive HSK3486 (0.4 mg kg -1 ) or propofol (2.0 mg kg -1 ) for induction before a maintenance infusion at initial rates of 0.8 and 5.0 mg kg -1 h -1 , and were adjusted to maintain a bispectral index (BIS) of 40-60 until the end of surgery.
Main outcome measures: Noninferiority between the drugs was evaluated as the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the between-group difference in the success rate of anesthetic maintenance (primary outcome) >-8%. Secondary outcomes included successful anaesthetic induction, full alertness and spontaneous breathing recovery, time until leaving the postanaesthesia care unit and changes in BIS. Safety profiles were also measured.
Results: Of 129 enrolled patients, 128 completed the trial, with 86 in the HSK3486 group and 42 in the propofol group. The success rate for the maintenance of general anaesthesia was 100% for both groups, and noninferiority of HSK3486 was confirmed (95% CI -4.28% to 8.38%). No significant differences were found between the two groups of patients with regard to secondary outcomes (all P > 0.05). There appeared to be a comparable incidence of treatment for emergency adverse events (TEAEs) (80.2% vs. 81.0%, P = 1.000) and drug-related TEAEs (57.0% vs. 64.3%, P = 0.451) in the HSK3486 and propofol groups.
Conclusion: HSK3486 had a noninferior efficacy profile compared to propofol, exhibiting excellent tolerance.
Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT04511728.
Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Comparison of the Efficacy of HSK3486 and Propofol for Induction of General Anesthesia in Adults: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled, Phase 3 Noninferiority Trial.Anesthesiology. 2024 Apr 1;140(4):690-700. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004886. Anesthesiology. 2024. PMID: 38150544 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy and safety of HSK3486 for the induction and maintenance of general anesthesia in elective surgical patients: a multicenter, randomized, open-label, propofol-controlled phase 2 clinical trial.Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2022 Feb;26(4):1114-1124. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202202_28101. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2022. PMID: 35253166 Clinical Trial.
-
Bispectral Index-Monitored Anesthesia Induction in Older Adults Undergoing Elective Surgery: Comparing Ciprofol and Propofol in a Prospective, Single-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study.Drug Des Devel Ther. 2024 Nov 5;18:4993-5003. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S484532. eCollection 2024. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2024. PMID: 39525043 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of ciprofol (HSK3486) versus propofol for anesthetic induction and non-ICU sedation.Front Pharmacol. 2023 Sep 25;14:1225288. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1225288. eCollection 2023. Front Pharmacol. 2023. PMID: 37818194 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and safety of Ciprofol compared with Propofol during general anesthesia induction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT).J Clin Anesth. 2024 Jun;94:111425. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111425. Epub 2024 Feb 26. J Clin Anesth. 2024. PMID: 38412619
Cited by
-
Efficacy and safety of ciprofol for sedation in outpatient gynecological procedures: a phase III multicenter randomized trial.Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Apr 23;11:1360508. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1360508. eCollection 2024. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024. PMID: 38716419 Free PMC article.
-
Ciprofol prevents ferroptosis in LPS induced acute lung injury by activating the Nrf2 signaling pathway.BMC Pulm Med. 2024 Nov 28;24(1):591. doi: 10.1186/s12890-024-03415-w. BMC Pulm Med. 2024. PMID: 39609781 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of ciprofol infusion on hemodynamics during induction and maintenance of anesthesia and on postoperative recovery in patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy: Study protocol for a randomized, controlled trial.PLoS One. 2024 Jul 10;19(7):e0305478. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305478. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38985796 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and safety of ciprofol versus propofol for anesthesia induction in adult patients received elective surgeries: a meta‑analysis.BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Mar 7;24(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02479-9. BMC Anesthesiol. 2024. PMID: 38454362 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and safety of ciprofol versus propofol for induction of general anaesthesia or sedation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Indian J Anaesth. 2024 Sep;68(9):776-794. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_104_24. Epub 2024 Aug 16. Indian J Anaesth. 2024. PMID: 39386394 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Qin L, Ren L, Wan S, et al. . Design, synthesis, and evaluation of novel 2,6-disubstituted phenol derivatives as general anesthetics. J Med Chem 2017; 60:3606–3617. - PubMed
-
- Teng Y, Ou M, Wang X, et al. . Efficacy and safety of ciprofol for the sedation/anesthesia in patients undergoing colonoscopy: phase IIa and IIb multicenter clinical trials. Eur J Pharm Sci 2021; 164:105904. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous