Preoperative prediction of malignancy and surgical treatment strategy in appendiceal tumors: multicenter review of 51 consecutive cases
- PMID: 36648548
- DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-02807-6
Preoperative prediction of malignancy and surgical treatment strategy in appendiceal tumors: multicenter review of 51 consecutive cases
Erratum in
-
Correction to: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Journal.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Feb 16;408(1):92. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02824-5. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023. PMID: 36792843 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Purpose: A diagnostic and treatment strategy for appendiceal tumors (ATs) has not been established. We aimed to evaluate our treatment strategy in ATs, including laparoscopic surgery (LS), and to identify preoperative malignancy predictors.
Methods: A total of 51 patients between 2011 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Data, including tumor markers and imaging findings, were compared between carcinoma and non-carcinoma patients. Validity of planned operation was evaluated based on pathological diagnosis.
Results: Twenty-five patients were diagnosed with carcinoma, 13 with low-grade mucinous neoplasm, and 13 with other diseases. Symptoms were more commonly present in carcinoma patients than in non-carcinoma patients (68.0% vs. 23.1%, p = 0.001). Elevated CEA and CA19-9 were more frequently observed in carcinoma patients than in non-carcinoma patients (p < 0.01 and p = 0.04, respectively). Five carcinoma patients had malignancy on biopsy, compared with zero non-carcinoma patients. Significant differences were noted in the percentages of carcinoma and non-carcinoma patients with solid enhanced mass (41.7% vs. 0%, p < 0.001) and tumor wall irregularity (16.7% vs. 0%, p = 0.03) on imaging. Although the sensitivity was not high, the specificity and positive predictive value of these findings were 100%. Forty-two patients (82.4%) underwent LS as minimally invasive exploratory and/or radical operation, of whom 2 were converted to open surgery for invasion of adjacent organ. No patients had intraoperative complications or postoperative mortality.
Conclusion: Clinical symptoms, elevated tumor markers, and worrisome features of solid enhanced mass and tumor wall irregularity on imaging can be malignancy predictors. For management of ATs, LS is feasible and useful for diagnosis and treatment.
Keywords: Appendiceal carcinoma; Appendiceal tumor; LAMN; Laparoscopic surgery; Mucinous neoplasm.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Hatch QM, Gilbert EW (2018) Appendiceal neoplasms. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 31(5):278–287. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1642051 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Connor SJ, Hanna GB, Frizelle FA (1998) Appendiceal tumors: retrospective clinicopathologic analysis of appendiceal tumors from 7,970 appendectomies. Dis Colon Rectum 41(1):75–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02236899 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Assarzadegan N, Montgomery E (2021) What is new in the 2019 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumors of the Digestive System: review of selected updates on neuroendocrine neoplasms, appendiceal tumors, and molecular testing. Arch Pathol Lab Med 145(6):664–677. https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2019-0665-RA - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Matsui S, Murata K, Fukunaga Y, Takeda T, Fujii M, Yamaguchi T, Kagawa Y, Mizushima T, Ohno Y, Yao T, Doki Y, Sugihara K (2020) Analysis of clinicopathological characteristics of appendiceal tumors in Japan: a multicenter collaborative retrospective clinical study- a Japanese Nationwide Survey. Dis Colon Rectum 63(10):1403–1410. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000001676 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Takeyama H, Murata K, Takeda T, Fujii M, Kagawa Y, Kawachi H, Yamaguchi T, Noura S, Masuishi T, Inoue A, Takii Y, Suto T, Sakamoto K, Tei M, Kishimoto M, Yao T, Sugihara K, Study group of appendiceal neoplasms in Japan Society of Colorectal Cancer Research G (2022) Clinical significance of lymph node dissection and lymph node metastasis in primary appendiceal tumor patients after curative resection: a retrospective multicenter cohort study. J Gastrointest Surg 26(1):128–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-021-05070-6 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
