Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Dec 27;13(1):22-40.
doi: 10.3390/clinpract13010003.

The Role of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Cancer Therapy

Affiliations
Review

The Role of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Cancer Therapy

Ahmed M Basudan. Clin Pract. .

Abstract

Over the years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) have become a powerful treatment strategy in the field of cancer immunotherapy. In the last decade, the number of FDA-approved CPIs has been increasing prominently, opening new horizons for the treatment of a wide range of tumor types. Pointedly, three immune checkpoint molecules have been under extensive research, which include cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) and its ligand-1 (PD-L1). Despite remarkable success, not all patients respond positively to therapy, which highlights the complexity of the tumor microenvironment (TME) and immune system. This has led to the identification of molecular biomarkers to predict response and toxicity. In addition, there has been an emerging focus on developing new delivery and targeting approaches for better drug efficacy and potency. In this review, we highlight the mechanism of action of major CPIs, their clinical impact, variation in effectiveness, response prediction, updated clinical indications, current challenges and limitations, promising novel approaches, and future directions.

Keywords: CTLA-4; PD-1; PD-L1; cancer; checkpoint inhibitors; immunotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
FDA-approved classes of immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs). CTLA-4 (through the interaction with its ligands B7-1/CD80 and B7-2/CD86) or PD-1 (via binding to its ligand PD-L1) trigger inhibitory signals to attenuate T-cell immune response. These T-cell receptor targets provide rationale for the use of CPIs such as anti-CTLA-4, PD-1, and PD-L1, which are illustrated with dotted-border boxes to increase immune response and kill tumor cells. CTLA-4: Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4; PD-1/PD-L1: Programmed cell death protein-1 and its ligand-1, respectively; APC: Antigen-presenting cell; Ag: Antigen; TCR: T-cell receptor; MHC: Major histocompatibility complex. (Figure was designed with BioRender.com, https://help.biorender.com/en/articles/3619405-how-do-i-cite-biorender, accessed on 7 November 2022).

References

    1. Burnet M. Cancer—A biological approach. I. The processes of control. Br. Med. J. 1957;1:779–786. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5022.779. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burnet F.M. The Concept of Immunological Surveillance. Prog. Exp. Tumor Res. 1970;13:1–27. doi: 10.1159/000386035. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thomas L. On immunosurveillance in human cancer. [(accessed on 9 October 2022)];Yale J. Biol. Med. 1982 55:329. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2596448/?report=abstract. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bretscher P., Cohn M. A theory of self-nonself discrimination. Science. 1970;169:1042–1049. doi: 10.1126/science.169.3950.1042. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jenkins M.K., Schwartz R.H. Antigen presentation by chemically modified splenocytes induces antigen-specific T cell unresponsiveness in vitro and in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 1987;165:302–319. doi: 10.1084/jem.165.2.302. - DOI - PMC - PubMed