Upper limb prostheses: bridging the sensory gap
- PMID: 36649123
- PMCID: PMC9996795
- DOI: 10.1177/17531934221131756
Upper limb prostheses: bridging the sensory gap
Abstract
Replacing human hand function with prostheses goes far beyond only recreating muscle movement with feedforward motor control. Natural sensory feedback is pivotal for fine dexterous control and finding both engineering and surgical solutions to replace this complex biological function is imperative to achieve prosthetic hand function that matches the human hand. This review outlines the nature of the problems underlying sensory restitution, the engineering methods that attempt to address this deficit and the surgical techniques that have been developed to integrate advanced neural interfaces with biological systems. Currently, there is no single solution to restore sensory feedback. Rather, encouraging animal models and early human studies have demonstrated that some elements of sensation can be restored to improve prosthetic control. However, these techniques are limited to highly specialized institutions and much further work is required to reproduce the results achieved, with the goal of increasing availability of advanced closed loop prostheses that allow sensory feedback to inform more precise feedforward control movements and increase functionality.
Keywords: Prostheses; bioelectronics; motor control; sensory feedback; signal processing.
Conflict of interest statement
M.O-C. has consulted for a company developing neuromusculoskeletal interfaces.
Figures
 
              
              
              
              
                
                
                 
              
              
              
              
                
                
                 
              
              
              
              
                
                
                References
- 
    - Ackerley R, Wasling HB, Ortiz-Catalan M, Brånemark R, Wessberg J. Case studies in neuroscience: sensations elicited and discrimination ability from nerve cuff stimulation in an amputee over time. J Neurophysiol. 2018, 120: 291–5. - PubMed
 
- 
    - Antfolk C, D’Alonzo M, Controzzi M, et al. Artificial redirection of sensation from prosthetic fingers to the phantom hand map on transradial amputees: vibrotactile versus mechanotactile sensory feedback. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2013, 21: 112–20. - PubMed
 
- 
    - Badia J, Boretius T, Andreu D, Azevedo-Coste C, Stieglitz T, Navarro X. Comparative analysis of transverse intrafascicular multichannel, longitudinal intrafascicular and multipolar cuff electrodes for the selective stimulation of nerve fascicles. J Neural Eng. 2011, 8: 036023. - PubMed
 
- 
    - Battaglia E, Clark JP, Bianchi M, Catalano MG, Bicchi A, O’Malley MK. Skin stretch haptic feedback to convey closure information in anthropomorphic, under-actuated upper limb soft prostheses. IEEE Trans Haptics. 2019, 12: 508–20. - PubMed
 
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
- Full Text Sources
- Medical
- Miscellaneous
 
        