Mnemicity: A Cognitive Gadget?
- PMID: 36649218
- PMCID: PMC11759954
- DOI: 10.1177/17456916221141352
Mnemicity: A Cognitive Gadget?
Abstract
Episodic representations can be entertained either as "remembered" or "imagined"-as outcomes of experience or as simulations of such experience. Here, we argue that this feature is the product of a dedicated cognitive function: the metacognitive capacity to determine the mnemicity of mental event simulations. We argue that mnemicity attribution should be distinguished from other metacognitive operations (such as reality monitoring) and propose that this attribution is a "cognitive gadget"-a distinctively human ability made possible by cultural learning. Cultural learning is a type of social learning in which traits are inherited through social interaction. In the case of mnemicity, one culturally learns to discriminate metacognitive "feelings of remembering" from other perceptual, emotional, action-related, and metacognitive feelings; to interpret feelings of remembering as indicators of memory rather than imagination; and to broadcast the interpreted feelings in culture- and context-specific ways, such as "I was there" or "I witnessed it myself." We review evidence from the literature on memory development and scaffolding, metacognitive learning and teaching, as well as cross-cultural psychology in support of this view before pointing out various open questions about the nature and development of mnemicity highlighted by our account.
Keywords: cultural learning; memory and imagination; mental time travel; reality monitoring.
Conflict of interest statement
We have no conflict of interest to declare.
References
-
- Addis DR (2018). Are episodic memories special? On the sameness of remembered and imagined event simulation. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 48(2–3), 64–88.
-
- Addis DR (2020). Mental time travel? A neurocognitive model of event simulation. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 11(2).
-
- Alea N, & Bluck S (2003). Why are you telling me that? A conceptual model of the social function of autobiographical memory. Memory, 11, 165–178. - PubMed
-
- Alter AL, & Oppenheimer DM (2009). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and social psychology review, 13(3), 219–235. - PubMed
-
- Anakwah N, Horselenberg R, Hope L, Amankwah‐Poku M, & Van Koppen PJ (2020a). Cross‐cultural differences in eyewitness memory reports. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 34(2), 504–515.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
