Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2023 Jan;63(1):79-88.
doi: 10.1111/head.14439. Epub 2023 Jan 18.

Once-daily oral atogepant for the long-term preventive treatment of migraine: Findings from a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Once-daily oral atogepant for the long-term preventive treatment of migraine: Findings from a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial

Messoud Ashina et al. Headache. 2023 Jan.

Erratum in

Abstract

Objective: To assess long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of once-daily oral atogepant 60 mg in adults with migraine.

Background: Atogepant is an oral, small-molecule, calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist approved for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine.

Methods: A 52-week, multicenter, randomized, open-label trial of adults (18-80 years) with migraine. Lead-in trial completers or newly enrolled participants with 4-14 migraine days/month were enrolled and randomized (5:2) to atogepant 60 mg once daily or oral standard care (SC) migraine preventive medication. The primary objective was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of atogepant; safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), clinical laboratory evaluations, vital signs, and Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale scores. Efficacy assessments (atogepant only) included change from baseline in mean monthly migraine days (MMDs) and the proportion of participants with reductions from baseline of ≥50%, ≥75%, and 100% in MMDs.

Results: The trial included 744 participants randomized to atogepant 60 mg (n = 546) or SC (n = 198). The atogepant safety population was 88.2% female (n = 479/543) with a mean (standard deviation) age of 42.5 (12.0) years. TEAEs occurred in 67.0% (n = 364/543) of participants treated with atogepant 60 mg. The most commonly reported TEAEs (≥5%) were upper respiratory tract infection (10.3%; 56/543), constipation (7.2%; 39/543), nausea (6.3%; 34/543), and urinary tract infection (5.2%; 28/543). Serious TEAEs were reported in 4.4% (24/543) for atogepant. Mean (standard error) change in MMDs for atogepant was -3.8 (0.1) for weeks 1-4 and -5.2 (0.2) at weeks 49-52. Similarly, the proportion of participants with ≥50%, ≥75%, and 100% reductions in MMDs increased from 60.4% (310/513), 37.2% (191/513), and 20.7% (106/513) at weeks 1-4 to 84.2% (282/335), 69.9% (234/335), and 48.4% (162/335), at weeks 49-52.

Conclusion: Daily use of oral atogepant 60 mg for preventive treatment of migraine during this 1-year, open-label trial was safe, well tolerated, and efficacious.

Keywords: atogepant; calcitonin gene-related peptide; gepant; migraine; migraine preventive.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Messoud Ashina (MA) is a consultant, speaker, or scientific advisor for AbbVie/Allergan, Alder, Amgen, Biohaven, Eli Lilly, Lundbeck, Novartis, Pfizer and Teva, and primary investigator for AbbVie/Allergan, Alder, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Lundbeck, Novartis, and Teva trials. MA has no ownership interest and does not own stocks of any pharmaceutical company. MA serves as associate editor of Cephalalgia, associate editor of The Journal of Headache and Pain, associate editor of Brain. Stewart J. Tepper (SJT) has served as a consultant for Acorda, Alder, Alexsa, Alphasights, Amgen, ATI, Axsome Therapeutics, BioDelivery Sciences International, Biohaven, Charleston Labs, Decision Resources, DeepBench, Dr. Reddy's, electroCore, Eli Lilly, eNeura, GLG, GSK, Guidepoint Global, Impel, M3 Global Research, Magellan Rx Management, Medicxi, Navigant Consulting, Neurolief, Nordic BioTech, Novartis, Pfizer, Reckner Healthcare, Relevale, Satsuma, Scion Neurostim, Slingshot Insights, Sorrento, Sudler and Hennessey, Teva, Theranica, Thought Leader Select, Trinity Partners, XOC, and Zosano. SJT receives a salary as editor‐in‐chief of Headache Currents from the American Headache Society and receives royalties for books published by Springer. Uwe Reuter (UR) is a consultant, speaker, or scientific advisor for AbbVie, Amgen, CoLucid, Lilly, Lundbeck, Medscape, Novartis, Perfood, Pfizer, and Teva. UR serves as associate editor of Frontiers in Neurology and of The Journal of Headache and Pain. UR is board member of the European Headache Federation. Andrew M. Blumenfeld (AMB) has served on advisory boards for AbbVie, Aeon, Alder, Allergan, Amgen, Axsome, Biohaven, Impel, Lundbeck, Lilly, Novartis, Revance, Teva, Theranica, and Zoscano and has received funding for speaking from AbbVie, Allergan, Amgen, Biohaven, Lundbeck, Lilly, and Teva. AMB is a consultant for AbbVie, Alder, Allergan, Amgen, Biohaven, Lilly, Lundbeck, Novartis, Teva, and Theranica and has received grant support from Allergan and Amgen. He is a contributing author for AbbVie, Allergan, Amgen, Biohaven, Novartis, Lilly, and Teva. Susan Hutchinson (SH) has served on advisory boards for AbbVie, Alder/Lundbeck, Amgen, Biohaven, Currax, electroCore, Eli Lilly, Impel, Novartis, Teva, Theranica, and Upsher‐Smith. SH is on the speakers bureaus for AbbVie, Amgen, Biohaven, electroCore, Eli Lilly, Lundbeck, Novartis, Teva, Theranica, and Upsher‐Smith. Joel M. Trugman is an employee of AbbVie and may hold AbbVie stock. Michelle Finnegan, Jing Xia, Rosa Miceli, and Lawrence Severt were employees of AbbVie at the time of study conduct and may hold AbbVie stock.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Participant disposition. aSC migraine prevention medication arm was included to contextualize hepatic laboratory data; efficacy outcomes were not collected in the SC arm; SC medication was selected by the investigator from an approved list in the protocol. ITT, intent‐to‐treat; mITT, modified intent‐to‐treat; N/A, not applicable; SC, standard care
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Change from baseline in number of monthly migraine days with once‐daily atogepant 60 mg (mITT population). Mixed‐effects model for repeated measures includes visit as a fixed effect, the baseline value as a covariate, and baseline‐by‐visit as an interaction term, with an unstructured covariance matrix. LS, least squares; mITT, modified intent‐to‐treat population
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Proportion of responders with ≥50%, ≥75%, and 100% reduction in monthly migraine days (mITT population). For each individual, a percentage reduction in MMDs during each respective treatment period was calculated relative to the 28‐day baseline period. The percentage of all participants achieving a ≥50%, ≥75%, and 100% reduction in MMDs is plotted for each treatment period. LS, least squares; mITT, modified intent‐to‐treat; MMD, monthly migraine day
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Change from baseline in number of monthly acute medication use days (mITT population). Mixed‐effects model for repeated measures includes visit as a fixed effect, the baseline value as a covariate, and baseline‐by‐visit as an interaction term, with an unstructured covariance matrix. LS, least squares; mITT, modified intent‐to‐treat

References

    1. Ashina M. Migraine. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:1866‐1876. - PubMed
    1. Ashina M, Katsarava Z, Do TP, et al. Migraine: epidemiology and systems of care. Lancet. 2021;397:1485‐1495. - PubMed
    1. Lampl C, Thomas H, Stovner LJ, et al. Interictal burden attributable to episodic headache: findings from the Eurolight project. J Headache Pain. 2016;17:9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Serrano D, Lipton RB, Scher AI, et al. Fluctuations in episodic and chronic migraine status over the course of 1 year: implications for diagnosis, treatment and clinical trial design. J Headache Pain. 2017;18:101. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schulman E. Refractory migraine—a review. Headache. 2013;53:599‐613. - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding