Comparison of objective and subjective visual quality after flapless laser vision correction for mild to moderate myopia: SMILE vs PRK
- PMID: 36652015
- DOI: 10.1007/s00417-022-05937-7
Comparison of objective and subjective visual quality after flapless laser vision correction for mild to moderate myopia: SMILE vs PRK
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the differences in surgical results and the objective and subjective quality of vision (QoV) of patients after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) versus alcohol-assisted photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).
Methods: Medical records of patients treated with SMILE and PRK were retrospectively examined. Visual quality, biometric parameters, Strehl ratio (SR), and corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) within a 6.0 mm area were recorded. The effective optical zone (EOZ) and decentration were measured using a tangential pre-post operation difference map. Subjective QoV and operation satisfaction were evaluated 6 months postoperatively using the Quality of Vision questionnaire.
Results: The study comprised 100 eyes treated with SMILE (preoperative mean spherical equivalent (SE), - 4.52 ± 0.81 dioptres (D)) and 69 eyes with PRK (mean SE, - 4.21 ± 1.25 D). Six months postoperatively, the EOZ reduction was significantly larger in the PRK group (P < 0.001). Decentrations were comparable between the groups. Regarding visual symptoms, monocular diplopia was more common following PRK (P = 0.02), and 98 (98.00%) SMILE-treated and 67 (97.10%) PRK-treated patients were satisfied with the QoV. Both groups demonstrated significant increases in total HOAs, coma, and spherical aberration (SA) at 6 months postoperatively compared to preoperatively (P < 0.001); these values were significantly higher in the PRK (P < 0.05) compared to the SMILE group. SR increased significantly only in the PRK group (P < 0.05).
Conclusion: Although EOZ was more consistent with anticipated treatment and HOAs were fewer in SMILE, high patient-reported satisfaction and good corneal optical quality were achieved in both groups, indicating that both SMILE and alcohol-assisted PRK are excellent options for mild to moderate myopia correction.
Keywords: Corneal topography; Myopia; Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK); Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE); Visual quality.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Comparing corneal higher-order aberrations in corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy versus small-incision lenticule extraction.J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018 Jun;44(6):725-733. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.03.028. Epub 2018 May 19. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018. PMID: 29789156
-
Comparison of ReLEx SMILE and PRK in terms of visual and refractive outcomes for the correction of low myopia.Int Ophthalmol. 2018 Jun;38(3):1147-1154. doi: 10.1007/s10792-017-0575-6. Epub 2017 May 27. Int Ophthalmol. 2018. PMID: 28551832 Clinical Trial.
-
Visual and Refractive Outcomes of Photorefractive Keratectomy and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) for Myopia.J Refract Surg. 2016 Aug 1;32(9):604-10. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20160602-02. J Refract Surg. 2016. PMID: 27598730 Clinical Trial.
-
Effective optical zone following small incision lenticule extraction: a review.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2024 Jun;262(6):1657-1665. doi: 10.1007/s00417-023-06263-2. Epub 2023 Oct 18. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2024. PMID: 37851133 Review.
-
Methods of Corneal Vertex Centration and Evaluation of Effective Optical Zone in Small Incision Lenticule Extraction.Ophthalmic Res. 2023;66(1):717-726. doi: 10.1159/000529922. Epub 2023 Mar 14. Ophthalmic Res. 2023. PMID: 36917962 Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of changes in objective visual quality based on tear film stability after SMILE surgery.Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Apr 25;12:1538359. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1538359. eCollection 2025. Front Med (Lausanne). 2025. PMID: 40351463 Free PMC article.
-
Subjective patient-reported visual quality after small-incision lenticule extraction and its correlation to the objective one.Int Ophthalmol. 2023 Nov;43(11):3935-3942. doi: 10.1007/s10792-023-02794-z. Epub 2023 Jul 6. Int Ophthalmol. 2023. PMID: 37410299
-
Comparative Analysis of Visual Outcomes and Complications in Intraocular Collamer Lens, Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction, and Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis Surgeries: A Comprehensive Review.Cureus. 2024 Apr 22;16(4):e58718. doi: 10.7759/cureus.58718. eCollection 2024 Apr. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38779265 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparative analysis of myopia correction outcomes and aberration changes between PRK and SMILE: A study based on strict refractive criteria.BMC Ophthalmol. 2025 Mar 12;25(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12886-025-03943-x. BMC Ophthalmol. 2025. PMID: 40075391 Free PMC article.
-
SMILE for correction of myopia in patients during the incipient phase of presbyopia.Int Ophthalmol. 2025 Jan 29;45(1):50. doi: 10.1007/s10792-025-03427-3. Int Ophthalmol. 2025. PMID: 39881018
References
-
- Reinstein DZ, Carp GI, Archer TJ, Gobbe M (2014) Outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in low myopia. J Refract Surg 30:812–818. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20141113-07 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Xu Y, Yang Y (2015) Small-incision lenticule extraction for myopia: results of a 12-month prospective study. Optom Vis Sci 92:123–131. https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000000451 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ang M, Gatinel D, Reinstein DZ, Mertens E, Alió Del Barrio JL, Alió JL (2021) Refractive surgery beyond 2020. Eye (Lond) 35:362–382. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-020-1096-5 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Reinstein DZ, Gobbe M, Gobbe L, Archer TJ, Carp GI (2015) Optical zone centration accuracy using corneal fixation-based SMILE compared to eye tracker-based femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for myopia. J Refract Surg 31:586–592. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20150820-03 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Kim T-I, Alió Del Barrio JL, Wilkins M, Cochener B, Ang M (2019) Refractive surgery. Lancet 393:2085–2098. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)33209-4 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials