The Impact of Receipt of Information on Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing on Screening with the Prostate-Specific Antigen Test

Abstract

There is controversy on prostate cancer screening with the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test in the USA, and as a result, there has been an increased push for physicians to have a thorough discussion with patients on the advantages and disadvantages of prostate cancer screening with the PSA blood test. Prior studies showed that pre-screening discussions increased the likelihood of PSA testing. This study is aimed at examining the impact of discussions of the advantages and disadvantages of the PSA test among men that fit the prostate cancer screening guidelines determined by the American Urological Association (AUA). This cross-sectional study used secondary data from the 2018 Behavior Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) in the USA. The analytic sample was determined based on the American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines for prostate cancer screening (n = 54,607). Approximately, 89.5% of men underwent PSA testing. The odds of PSA testing were higher for men who received information on only the advantages of PSA testing (OR = 3.40, 95% CI = 2.80, 4.13), only the disadvantages of PSA testing (OR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.02, 2.28), and both advantages and disadvantages of PSA testing (OR = 2.99, 95% CI = 2.46, 3.63) compared to men who received no information. Discussions with men, that meet the requirements for prostate cancer screening, about the advantages and disadvantages of PSA testing increased the likelihood that men would undergo PSA testing.

Keywords: Cancer education; Prostate cancer screening; Prostate-specific antigen; Shared decision making; USA.