Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 3;6(1):e2251353.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.51353.

Analysis by Gender and Race and Ethnicity of Reviewers and Awardees for Intramural Research Funding in the Veterans Health Administration

Taylor L Boyer  1 , Utibe R Essien  1   2 , Terrence M A Litam  1 , Leslie R M Hausmann  1   2 , Katie J Suda  1   2
Affiliations

Analysis by Gender and Race and Ethnicity of Reviewers and Awardees for Intramural Research Funding in the Veterans Health Administration

Taylor L Boyer et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: Underrepresentation of women and racial and ethnic minority individuals among reviewers and funded investigators in health research has been widely reported. It is unknown whether such underrepresentation exists in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA).

Objective: To describe gender and racial and ethnic makeup of VHA Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D) study sections and funding awardees and to explore the associations between gender and racial and ethnic makeup of study sections and awardees who were women and racial and ethnic minority individuals.

Design, setting, and participants: This cross-sectional study at the VHA evaluated study section members and funding awardees from 5 review cycles from March 13, 2018, through March 6, 2020, identified via the HSR&D and National Institutes of Health websites.

Main outcomes and measures: Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine the likelihood of an awardee being a woman or a racial or ethnic minority individual based on the gender and racial and ethnic makeup of study sections, respectively. Separate models were conducted for investigator-initiated research proposals only.

Results: Thirty-six study sections comprised 664 reviewers, including 381 women (57.4%) and 81 racial and ethnic minority individuals (12.2%). Of the 146 funded proposals, 77 (52.7%) were awarded to women and 25 (17.1%) to racial and ethnic minority investigators; 29 (19.9%) were reviewed by study sections with no racial and ethnic minority reviewers. The odds of a woman awardee were more than 5 times greater for proposals reviewed by study sections comprising the highest proportion of women (fourth quartile; >58.3%) than the lowest proportion of women (first quartile; ≤50.0%) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 5.24 [95% CI, 1.70-16.13]). Similarly, the odds of a racial or ethnic minority awardee were 3 times greater for proposals reviewed by study sections in the top 50th percentile for proportion of racial and ethnic minority individuals (>7.3%) than the bottom 50th percentile (aOR, 3.08 [95% CI, 1.18-8.09]). Secondary analyses limited to investigator-initiated research proposals identified similar associations.

Conclusions and relevance: In this cross-sectional study of VHA HSR&D-funded research, racial and ethnic minority individuals were underrepresented among investigators and reviewers. More women and racial and ethnic minority reviewers on study sections were associated with women and racial and ethnic minority individuals awarded funding.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Essien reported receiving grant funding from the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) outside the submitted work. Dr Hausmann reported receiving grant funding from the VA outside the submitted work and serving on a VA study section. Dr Suda reported receiving grant funding from the National Institutes of Health, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, US Food and Drug Administration, VA, and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention outside the submitted work and serving on a VA study section. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Frequency of Proportions of Women Reviewers on Study Sections for Each Funded Proposal, Grouped by Quartiles
Thirty-six unique study sections convened over 5 review cycles; study sections are individually represented for each of the 146 proposals awarded funding.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Frequency of Proportions of Racial and Ethnic Reviewers on Study Sections for Each Funded Proposal, Grouped by Percentiles
Thirty-six unique study sections convened over 5 review cycles; study sections are individually represented for each of the 146 proposals awarded funding.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Executive Office of the President . Diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility in the Federal workforce. Executive Order 14035. Federal Register. June 30, 2021. Accessed June 25, 2021. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/06/30/2021-14127/diversit...
    1. US Department of Veterans Affairs . Diversity, equity, and inclusion initiative. Reviewed September 23, 2022. Accessed December 9, 2022. https://www.research.va.gov/programs/dei/default.cfm
    1. National Institutes of Health . Budget. Reviewed August 18, 2022. Accessed December 9, 2022. https://www.nih.gov/about-nih/what-we-do/budget#note
    1. Ginther DK, Schaffer WT, Schnell J, et al. . Race, ethnicity, and NIH research awards. Science. 2011;333(6045):1015-1019. doi:10.1126/science.1196783 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Byrnes N . Race & peer review. June 12, 2020. Accessed July 29, 2022. https://www.csr.nih.gov/reviewmatters/2020/06/12/race-peer-review/