Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2023 Jan 18:25:e40725.
doi: 10.2196/40725.

Web-Based Asynchronous Tool to Facilitate Communication Between Primary Care Providers and Cancer Specialists: Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial

Bojana Petrovic  1   2 , Jim A Julian  3 , Clare Liddy  4   5 , Amir Afkham  6 , Sharon F McGee  7 , Scott C Morgan  7   8 , Roanne Segal  7 , Jonathan Sussman  3 , Gregory R Pond  3 , Mary Ann O'Brien  1 , Jacqueline L Bender  2   9   10 , Eva Grunfeld  1   2   10   11
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Web-Based Asynchronous Tool to Facilitate Communication Between Primary Care Providers and Cancer Specialists: Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial

Bojana Petrovic et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: Cancer poses a significant global health burden. With advances in screening and treatment, there are now a growing number of cancer survivors with complex needs, requiring the involvement of multiple health care providers. Previous studies have identified problems related to communication and care coordination between primary care providers (PCPs) and cancer specialists.

Objective: This study aimed to examine whether a web- and text-based asynchronous system (eOncoNote) could facilitate communication between PCPs and cancer specialists (oncologists and oncology nurses) to improve patient-reported continuity of care among patients receiving treatment or posttreatment survivorship care.

Methods: In this pragmatic randomized controlled trial, a total of 173 patients were randomly assigned to either the intervention group (eOncoNote plus usual methods of communication between PCPs and cancer specialists) or a control group (usual communication only), including 104 (60.1%) patients in the survivorship phase (breast and colorectal cancer) and 69 (39.9%) patients in the treatment phase (breast and prostate cancer). The primary outcome was patient-reported team and cross-boundary continuity (Nijmegen Continuity Questionnaire). Secondary outcome measures included the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7), Patient Health Questionnaire on Major Depression, and Picker Patient Experience Questionnaire. Patients completed the questionnaires at baseline and at 2 points following randomization. Patients in the treatment phase completed follow-up questionnaires at 1 month and at either 4 months (patients with prostate cancer) or 6 months following randomization (patients with breast cancer). Patients in the survivorship phase completed follow-up questionnaires at 6 months and at 12 months following randomization.

Results: The results did not show an intervention effect on the primary outcome of team and cross-boundary continuity of care or on the secondary outcomes of depression and patient experience with their health care. However, there was an intervention effect on anxiety. In the treatment phase, there was a statistically significant difference in the change score from baseline to the 1-month follow-up for GAD-7 (mean difference -2.3; P=.03). In the survivorship phase, there was a statistically significant difference in the change score for GAD-7 between baseline and the 6-month follow-up (mean difference -1.7; P=.03) and between baseline and the 12-month follow-up (mean difference -2.4; P=.004).

Conclusions: PCPs' and cancer specialists' access to eOncoNote is not significantly associated with patient-reported continuity of care. However, PCPs' and cancer specialists' access to the eOncoNote intervention may be a factor in reducing patient anxiety.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03333785; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03333785.

Keywords: cancer; coordination of care; electronic communication; primary care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Screenshot of eOncoNote discussion page.
Figure 2
Figure 2
eOncoNote intervention process flowchart. PCP: primary care provider.
Figure 3
Figure 3
eOncoNote trial schema.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Roser M, Ritchie H. Cancer. Our World In Data. 2019. Nov, [2022-09-10]. https://ourworldindata.org/cancer .
    1. Side effects of cancer treatment. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [2020-07-13]. https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/survivors/patients/side-effects-of-treatment.htm .
    1. Long-term side effects of cancer treatment. American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2019. Sep, [2020-07-13]. https://www.cancer.net/survivorship/long-term-side-effects-cancer-treatment .
    1. Jones P, Shakdher S, Singh P. Synthesis maps: visual knowledge translation for the CanIMPACT clinical system and patient cancer journeys. Curr Oncol. 2017 Apr 01;24(2):129–34. doi: 10.3747/co.24.3452. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/28490928 conc-24-129 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rubin G, Berendsen A, Crawford SM, Dommett R, Earle C, Emery J, Fahey T, Grassi L, Grunfeld E, Gupta S, Hamilton W, Hiom S, Hunter D, Lyratzopoulos G, Macleod U, Mason R, Mitchell G, Neal RD, Peake M, Roland M, Seifert B, Sisler J, Sussman J, Taplin S, Vedsted P, Voruganti T, Walter F, Wardle J, Watson E, Weller D, Wender R, Whelan J, Whitlock J, Wilkinson C, de Wit N, Zimmermann C. The expanding role of primary care in cancer control. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Sep;16(12):1231–72. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00205-3.S1470-2045(15)00205-3 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data

Grants and funding