Co-design Process of a Digital Return-to-Work Solution for People With Common Mental Disorders: Stakeholder Perception Study
- PMID: 36652285
- PMCID: PMC9892984
- DOI: 10.2196/39422
Co-design Process of a Digital Return-to-Work Solution for People With Common Mental Disorders: Stakeholder Perception Study
Abstract
Background: Service users and other stakeholders have had few opportunities to influence the design of their mental health and return-to-work services. Likewise, digital solutions often fail to align with stakeholders' needs and preferences, negatively impacting their utility. mWorks is a co-design initiative to create a digital return-to-work solution for persons with common mental disorders that is acceptable and engaging for those receiving and delivering the intervention.
Objective: This study aimed to describe stakeholder perceptions and the involvement of a design process during the prototype development of mWorks.
Methods: A co-design approach was used during the iterative development of mWorks. Overall, 86 stakeholders were recruited using a combination of purposeful and convenience sampling. Five stakeholder groups represented service users with experience of sick leave and common mental disorders (n=25), return-to-work professionals (n=19), employers (n=1), digital design and system developers (n=4), and members of the public (n=37). Multiple data sources were gathered using 7 iterations, from March 2018 to November 2020. The rich material was organized and analyzed using content analysis to generate themes and categories that represented this study's findings.
Results: The themes revealed the importance of mWorks in empowering service users with a personal digital support solution that engages them back in work. The categories highlighted that mWorks needs to be a self-management tool that enables service users to self-manage as a supplement to traditional return-to-work services. It was also important that content features helped to reshape a positive self-narrative, with a focus on service users' strengths and resources to break the downward spiral of ill health during sick leave. Additional crucial features included helping service users mobilize their own strategies to cope with thoughts and feelings and formulate goals and a plan for their work return. Once testing of the alpha and beta prototypes began, user engagement became the main focus for greater usability. It is critical to facilitate the comprehension and purpose of mWorks, offer clear guidance, and enhance motivational and goal-setting strategies.
Conclusions: Stakeholders' experience-based knowledge asserted that mWorks needs to empower service users by providing them with a personal support tool. To enhance return-to-work prospects, users must be engaged in a meaningful manner while focusing on their strengths and resources.
Keywords: co-design; mental health; mobile health; return-to-work; supported employment.
©Patrik Engdahl, Petra Svedberg, Annika Lexén, Carina Tjörnstrand, Catharina Strid, Ulrika Bejerholm. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 18.01.2023.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Similar articles
-
Role of a Digital Return-To-Work Solution for Individuals With Common Mental Disorders: Qualitative Study of the Perspectives of Three Stakeholder Groups.JMIR Form Res. 2020 Sep 16;4(9):e15625. doi: 10.2196/15625. JMIR Form Res. 2020. PMID: 32936089 Free PMC article.
-
Acceptability of a digital return-to-work intervention for common mental disorders: a qualitative study on service user perspectives.BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Aug 3;21(1):384. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03386-w. BMC Psychiatry. 2021. PMID: 34344327 Free PMC article.
-
Co-Designing a Digital App to Support Young People's Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (VoiceIn): Development and Usability Study.JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Oct 24;11:e53394. doi: 10.2196/53394. JMIR Hum Factors. 2024. PMID: 39447156 Free PMC article.
-
The Involvement of Service Users and People With Lived Experience in Mental Health Care Innovation Through Design: Systematic Review.JMIR Ment Health. 2023 Jul 25;10:e46590. doi: 10.2196/46590. JMIR Ment Health. 2023. PMID: 37490326 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun. Campbell Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38873396 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Human-Centered Design and Digital Transformation of Mental Health Services.JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Aug 11;12:e66040. doi: 10.2196/66040. JMIR Hum Factors. 2025. PMID: 40789172 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Exploring perspectives on digital smoking cessation just-in-time adaptive interventions: A focus group study with adult smokers and smoking cessation professionals.PLOS Digit Health. 2025 May 2;4(5):e0000705. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000705. eCollection 2025 May. PLOS Digit Health. 2025. PMID: 40315200 Free PMC article.
-
Examining Challenges to Co-Design Digital Health Interventions With End Users: Systematic Review.J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 14;27:e50178. doi: 10.2196/50178. J Med Internet Res. 2025. PMID: 40085834 Free PMC article.
-
Evolving Adult ADHD Care: Preparatory Evaluation of a Prototype Digital Service Model Innovation for ADHD Care.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 May 1;21(5):582. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21050582. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38791796 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Batalden M, Batalden P, Margolis P, Seid M, Armstrong G, Opipari-Arrigan L, Hartung H. Coproduction of healthcare service. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Jul;25(7):509–17. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004315. http://qualitysafety.bmj.com/lookup/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=26376674 bmjqs-2015-004315 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- A vision for primary health care in the 21st century: towards universal health coverage and the Sustainable Development Goals. World Health Organization and United Nations Children's Fund. 2018. [2022-05-30]. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/328065 .
-
- Elwyn G, Nelson E, Hager A, Price A. Coproduction: when users define quality. BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Sep;29(9):711–6. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009830. http://qualitysafety.bmj.com/lookup/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=31488570 bmjqs-2019-009830 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources