Challenges in Organ-sparing Surgery for Penile Cancer: What Are the Limits?

Abstract

Organ-sparing surgery (OSS) is endorsed by the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines as the preferred treatment for distal primary penile cancer. The recommendation states that OSS should be used whenever possible, without exactly defining what constitutes "possible". This recommendation is based on findings showing that this approach has no detrimental impact on survival. At the same time, OSS results in preservation of quality of life (QoL) and of various functions of the penis. However, while narrow tumor-free margins (>1 mm) are deemed oncologically safe, there is a higher risk of local recurrence. Recent data have emerged that question the dogma that a local recurrence does not impact survival outcomes. In this mini review, we highlight areas of discrepancy in current guidelines and describe challenges for a surgical approach with a delicate balance between oncological safety on the one hand and maximal preservation of QoL and penile functions on the other. PATIENT SUMMARY: Organ-sparing surgery has been recommended as the preferred treatment for primary cancer of the penis, as quality of life and sexual function are maximally preserved. In this review we identify challenges and limitations in routinely adopting this approach.

Keywords: Penile squamous cell carcinoma; Penile-sparing surgery; Quality of life; Recurrence; Sexual wellbeing; Survival.