Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 18;24(1):38.
doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-07008-y.

Phlebotomy resulting in controlled hypovolemia to prevent blood loss in major hepatic resections (PRICE-2): study protocol for a phase 3 randomized controlled trial

Affiliations

Phlebotomy resulting in controlled hypovolemia to prevent blood loss in major hepatic resections (PRICE-2): study protocol for a phase 3 randomized controlled trial

Guillaume Martel et al. Trials. .

Abstract

Introduction: Blood loss and red blood cell (RBC) transfusion in liver surgery are areas of concern for surgeons, anesthesiologists, and patients alike. While various methods are employed to reduce surgical blood loss, the evidence base surrounding each intervention is limited. Hypovolemic phlebotomy, the removal of whole blood from the patient without volume replacement during liver transection, has been strongly associated with decreased bleeding and RBC transfusion in observational studies. This trial aims to investigate whether hypovolemic phlebotomy is superior to usual care in reducing RBC transfusions in liver resection.

Methods: This study is a double-blind multicenter randomized controlled trial. Adult patients undergoing major hepatic resections for any indication will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either hypovolemic phlebotomy and usual care or usual care alone. Exclusion criteria will be minor resections, preoperative hemoglobin <100g/L, renal insufficiency, and other contraindication to hypovolemic phlebotomy. The primary outcome will be the proportion of patients receiving at least one allogeneic RBC transfusion unit within 30 days of the onset of surgery. Secondary outcomes will include transfusion of other allogeneic blood products, blood loss, morbidity, mortality, and intraoperative physiologic parameters. The surgical team will be blinded to the intervention. Randomization will occur on the morning of surgery. The sample size will comprise 440 patients. Enrolment will occur at four Canadian academic liver surgery centers over a 4-year period. Ethics approval will be obtained at participating sites before enrolment.

Discussion: The results of this randomized control trial will provide high-quality evidence regarding the use of hypovolemic phlebotomy in major liver resection and its effects on RBC transfusion. If proven to be effective, this intervention could become standard of care in liver operations internationally and become incorporated within perioperative patient blood management programs.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03651154 . Registered on August 29 2018.

Keywords: Autologous blood transfusion; Blood loss; Blood transfusion; Hemodilution; Hepatectomy; Hypovolemia; Liver resection; Phlebotomy; Randomized controlled trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Schedule of enrollment, interventions, and assessments. POD, postoperative day; Hx, history; DM, diabetes mellitus; AIDS, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome; CKD, chronic kidney disease; CHF, congestive heart failure; MI, myocardial infarction; PUD, peptic ulcer disease; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; PVD, peripheral vascular disease; CVA, cardiovascular accident; TIA, transient ischemic attack; PVE, portal vein embolization; Hgb, hemoglobin; INR, international normalized ratio; AST, aspartate transaminase; ALT, alanine transaminase; GGT, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; CA 19-9, carbohydrate antigen 19-9; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; CVP, central venous pressure; PPV, pulse pressure variation; MAP, mean arterial pressure; RBC, red blood cell

References

    1. McColl RJ, Brar B, Ghali WA, Dixon E. Hepatic resection in Canada: rates and geographic variation. Can J Surg. 2009;52:E264–E268. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jarnagin WR, Gonen M, Fong Y, DeMatteo RP, Ben-Porat L, Little S, et al. Improvement in perioperative outcome after hepatic resection: analysis of 1,803 consecutive cases over the past decade. Ann Surg. 2002. 10.1097/01.SLA.0000029003.66466.B3. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Poon RT, Fan ST, Lo CM, Liu CL, Lam CM, Yuen WK, et al. Improving perioperative outcome expands the role of hepatectomy in management of benign and malignant hepatobiliary diseases. Ann Surg. 2004. 10.1097/01.sla.0000141195.66155.0c. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andreou A, Aloia TA, Brouquet A, Dickson PV, Zimmitti G, Maru DM, et al. Margin status remains an important determinant of survival after surgical resection of colorectal liver metastases in the era of modern chemotherapy. Ann Surg. 2013. 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318283a4d1. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sima CS, Jarnagin WR, Fong Y, Elkin E, Fischer M, Wuest D, et al. Predicting the risk of perioperative transfusion for patients undergoing elective hepatectomy. Ann Surg. 2009. 10.1097/sla.0b013e3181b7fad3. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data