Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 18;19(1):6.
doi: 10.1186/s13223-023-00763-w.

Cow's milk allergy skin tests: fresh milk, commercial extracts, or both?

Affiliations

Cow's milk allergy skin tests: fresh milk, commercial extracts, or both?

Idit Lachover-Roth et al. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. .

Abstract

Background: The diagnosis of food allergy is based on a history of immediate allergic reaction following food ingestion, and skin prick test (SPT) demonstrating sensitization with commercial extracts (CE) or fresh food (FF). For most food allergens, the SPT with FF is considered more accurate and predictive. Regarding cow's milk, the results are inconclusive. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of SPT with fresh milk compared to CE (cow's milk and casein) for evaluation of cow's milk allergy (CMA).

Methods: This study summarized the medical records of children, diagnosed with CMA. The data include demographics, skin tests and oral food challenge results, as well as atopic comorbidities.

Results: Records of 698 patients with the diagnosis of CMA were reviewed, 388 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Overall, 134 patients (34.54%) had an additional atopic disease. The SPT wheal size with fresh milk was significantly larger than with CE (cow's milk and casein) at first evaluation or before oral food challenge (OFC). Combination of SPT results (CE and FF) gave the maximal odds ratio for reaction during OFC and SPT with fresh milk alone gave the minimal OR (34.18 and 4.74, respectively).

Conclusions: SPT with CE for CMA evaluation is more reliable than SPT performed with fresh milk. In patients suspected of having IgE-mediated CMA, before deciding on performing OFC, it is advised to perform SPT with at least two different extracts, and always include casein. Fresh milk can serve as a backup if commercial extracts are not available. In cases that the SPT with fresh milk is 3 mm or less, there is 93.3% chance that the OFC will pass without reaction. Trial registration This study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Meir Medical Center, IRB Number 0083-18 MMC.

Keywords: Commercial extracts; Cow’s milk allergy; Food allergy; Fresh food; Skin prick test (SPT).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patient flow diagram. CMA cow's milk allergy; OFC oral food challenge; SPT skin prick test
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Skin prick tests wheal size (mm) in the different study groups. A Mean skin prick test results at diagnosis. B Mean last skin prick test results. Only significant differences are shown
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The ratio between the last skin prick test and the first skin prick test recorded according to the study groups. OFC oral food challenge; SPT skin prick test. The valid number of SPT for calculations—Not allergic (casein—145, milk extract—147, fresh milk—118), allergic by OFC (casein—27, milk extract—28, fresh milk—25), and allergic by SPT (casein—140, milk extract—143, fresh milk—129)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
ROC curve for the ratio between the last and the first SPT with the different extracts. ROC curve created for groups A1 and B (Allergic by oral food challenge and Not allergic by oral food challenge)

References

    1. Lopes JP, Sicherer S. Food allergy: epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment. Curr Opin Immunol. 2020;66:57–64. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2020.03.014. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schoemaker AA, Sprikkelman AB, Grimshaw KE, Roberts G, Grabenhenrich L, Rosenfeld L, et al. Incidence and natural history of challenge-proven cow's milk allergy in European children–EuroPrevall birth cohort. Allergy. 2015;70(8):963–972. doi: 10.1111/all.12630. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Katz Y, Rajuan N, Goldberg MR, Eisenberg E, Heyman E, Cohen A, et al. Early exposure to cow's milk protein is protective against IgE-mediated cow's milk protein allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;126(1):77–82 e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.04.020. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Peters RL, Gurrin LC, Allen KJ. The predictive value of skin prick testing for challenge-proven food allergy: a systematic review. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2012;23(4):347–352. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2011.01237.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eigenmann PA, Sampson HA. Interpreting skin prick tests in the evaluation of food allergy in children. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 1998;9(4):186–191. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.1998.tb00371.x. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources