Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct;308(4):1047-1056.
doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06862-0. Epub 2023 Jan 19.

Efficacy and safety of oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists in moderate-to-severe endometriosis-associated pain: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Affiliations

Efficacy and safety of oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists in moderate-to-severe endometriosis-associated pain: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Lingli Xin et al. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this NMA is to comprehensively analyze evidence of oral GnRH antagonist in the treatment of moderate-to-severe endometriosis-associated pain.

Methods: Literature searching was performed to select eligible studies published prior to April 2022 in PubMed, Cochrane, Embase and Web of Science. Randomized controlled trials involving patients who suffered from moderate-to-severe endometriosis-associated pain and treated with oral nonpeptide GnRH antagonists or placebo were included.

Results: Elagolix 400 mg and ASP1707 15 mg were most efficient in reducing pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea and dyspareunia. Relugolix 40 mg was best in reducing the analgesics use. The rates of any TEAEs and TEAEs-related discontinuation were highest in relugolix 40 mg and elagolix 250 mg, respectively, while rates of hot flush and headache were highest in relugolix 40 mg and elagolix 150 mg. Significantly decreased spinal BMD was observed in elagolix 250 mg.

Conclusion: Oral GnRH antagonists were effective in endometriosis-associated pain in 12w, and most of the efficiency and safety outcomes were expressed in a dose-dependent manner, but linzagolix 75 mg was an exception.

Keywords: Efficiency; Endometriosis; Oral GnRH antagonists; Pain; Safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of literature searching
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Risk of bias assessment
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Assessment of pain related outcomes
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Assessment of safety related outcomes

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Eskenazi B, Warner ML. Epidemiology of endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1997;24(2):235–258. doi: 10.1016/s0889-8545(05)70302-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Giudice LC. Clinical practice. Endometr N Engl J Med. 2010;362(25):2389–2398. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1000274. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Della Corte L, Di Filippo C, Gabrielli O, et al. The burden of endometriosis on women’s lifespan: a narrative overview on quality of life and psychosocial wellbeing. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134683. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gao X, Outley J, Botteman M, Spalding J, Simon JA, Pashos CL. Economic burden of endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2006;86(6):1561–1572. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.06.015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rafique S, Decherney AH. Medical management of endometriosis. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2017;60(3):485–496. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000292. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types