Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 20;72(3):55-62.
doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7203a2.

Alcohol Use, Screening, and Brief Intervention Among Pregnant Persons - 24 U.S. Jurisdictions, 2017 and 2019

Alcohol Use, Screening, and Brief Intervention Among Pregnant Persons - 24 U.S. Jurisdictions, 2017 and 2019

Jackie Luong et al. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. .

Abstract

Alcohol use during pregnancy is a major preventable cause of adverse alcohol-related outcomes, including birth defects and developmental disabilities.* Alcohol screening and brief intervention (ASBI) is an evidence-based primary care tool that has been shown to prevent or reduce alcohol consumption during pregnancy; interventions have resulted in an increase in the proportion of pregnant women reporting abstinence (odds ratio = 2.26; 95% CI = 1.43-3.56) (1). Previous national estimates have not characterized ASBI in populations of pregnant persons. Using 2017 and 2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data, CDC examined prevalence of ASBI and characteristics of pregnant persons and nonpregnant women aged 18-49 years (reproductive-aged women) residing in jurisdictions that participated in the BRFSS ASBI module. During their most recent health care visit within the past 2 years, approximately 80% of pregnant persons reported being asked about their alcohol use; however, only 16% of pregnant persons who self-reported current drinking at the time of the survey (at least one alcoholic beverage in the past 30 days) were advised by a health care provider to quit drinking or reduce their alcohol use. Further, the prevalence of screening among pregnant persons who did not graduate from high school was lower than that among those who did graduate from high school or had at least some college education. This gap between screening and brief intervention, along with disparities in screening based on educational level, indicate missed opportunities to reduce alcohol use during pregnancy. Strategies to enhance ASBI during pregnancy include integrating screenings into electronic health records, increasing reimbursement for ASBI services, developing additional tools, including electronic ASBI, that can be implemented in a variety of settings (2,3).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors have completed and submitted the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Figures

FIGURE
FIGURE
Prevalence of age-standardized alcohol screening and brief intervention among pregnant persons — Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, Alcohol Screening and Brief Intervention module, 23 states and the District of Columbia, 2017 and 2019 Abbreviation: BRFSS = Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. * With 95% CIs indicated by error bars. Brief intervention was based on responses to the questions, “Were you offered advice about what level of drinking is harmful or risky for your health?” and “At your last routine checkup, were you advised to reduce or quit your drinking?” These questions are only asked if participants responded “Yes” to the question, “You told me earlier that your last routine checkup was [within the past 2 years]. At that checkup, were you asked in person or on a form if you drink alcohol?” Because of survey design, it could not be determined whether the health care provider screened for alcohol use and gave a brief intervention before or after the patient reported alcohol use, or if the patient was using alcohol at the time of the health care visit. Self-reported current drinking was based on the BRFSS calculated variable of “Adults who reported having had at least one drink of alcohol in the past 30 days.” § Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Georgia, Illinois, Kansas, Maryland, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Utah, and Wisconsin.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. O’Connor EA, Perdue LA, Senger CA, et al. Screening and behavioral counseling interventions to reduce unhealthy alcohol use in adolescents and adults: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA 2018;320:1910–28. 10.1001/jama.2018.12086 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ondersma SJ, Beatty JR, Svikis DS, et al. Computer-delivered screening and brief intervention for alcohol use in pregnancy: a pilot randomized trial. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2015;39:1219–26. 10.1111/acer.12747 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mulia N, Schmidt LA, Ye Y, Greenfield TK. Preventing disparities in alcohol screening and brief intervention: the need to move beyond primary care. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2011;35:1557–60. 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01501.x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Denny CH, Acero CS, Naimi TS, Kim SY. Consumption of alcohol beverages and binge drinking among pregnant women aged 18–44 years—United States, 2015–2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2019;68:365–8. 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.05.017 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gosdin LK, Deputy NP, Kim SY, Dang EP, Denny CH. Alcohol consumption and binge drinking during pregnancy among adults aged 18–49 years—United States, 2018–2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2022;71:10–3. 10.15585/mmwr.mm7101a2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed