Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 19;18(1):e0275141.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275141. eCollection 2023.

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards HPV vaccination among reproductive age women in a HIV hotspot in the US

Affiliations

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards HPV vaccination among reproductive age women in a HIV hotspot in the US

Aasith Villavicencio et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted infection (STI) in the US, responsible for cervical cancer and increased risk of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) acquisition. Despite an effective HPV vaccine, women's HPV vaccination coverage and rates remain far below desired levels. This study aimed to evaluate HPV knowledge, attitudes, and vaccination practices as well as factors associated with HPV vaccination among women of reproductive age living in Miami, Florida, a Southern US city with a high incidence of STIs and low HPV vaccination coverage.

Methods: From April to June 2022, 100 HIV-negative, cisgender, sexually active women aged 18-45 years were recruited from the Miami community. Participants completed validated questionnaires using REDCap© electronic surveys, assessing socio-demographics and sexual behaviors; HPV knowledge, screening, vaccination practices; barriers and motivators to HPV vaccination. A cumulative HPV knowledge score (HPV score) was generated. Factors associated with HPV vaccination were analyzed by Chi-square, Fisher's exact test, studentized t-test, and multivariate logistic regression (MLR).

Results: A total of 100 participants were enrolled, and 84 who knew their vaccination status were included in the analysis. Of these, 43 reported receiving at least 1 HPV vaccine dose (vaccinated group) and 41 reported never being vaccinated (unvaccinated group). Mean age was 24.7 (SD 4.03) years for the vaccinated group and 31.4 (SD 8.33) for the unvaccinated group. Mean HPV score was 18.9/29 (SD 6.05) for the vaccinated group and 9.1/29 (SD 8.82) for the unvaccinated group. Amongst vaccinated participants, 76.74% reported a history of HPV/Pap smear screening vs 87.80% in the unvaccinated group. Barriers to HPV vaccination included: 14.6% low-risk perception, 29.3% healthcare barriers, and 46.3% vaccine hesitancy and personal beliefs. Motivators t HPV vaccination included: risk perception and vaccine beliefs (71.42%), healthcare-related (60.71%) and social motivators (55.95%). In the first MLR, one-point increases in HPV score were significantly associated with higher odds of HPV vaccination until an HPV score of 16, and a one-year increase in age was associated with a 16% lower odds of HPV vaccination (aOR = 0.84, 95% CI [0.72, 0.99]; p = 0.035). Contraception use was also associated with HPV vaccination (aOR 8.36 (95% CI [1.41, 49.62]; p = 0.020). Race, ethnicity, college education status, and number of sexual partners were not significant predictors of HPV vaccination. In the second MLR evaluating vaccination motivators as predictors of HPV vaccination, we found that individuals who were motivated by healthcare had 3.03 (95% CI [1.02, 9.00]; p = 0.046) times the odds of HPV vaccination compared to individuals without healthcare-related motivators.

Conclusion: Findings suggest suboptimal HPV knowledge and low vaccination rates among women of reproductive age. Public health efforts should focus on increasing basic HPV knowledge among women with little-to-no HPV knowledge to increase vaccine uptake.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Predictors of HPV vaccination in multivariate logistic regression (model 1, n = 84).
Predictors of HPV vaccination in a multivariable logistic regression model containing age, race, ethnicity, educational attainment, current contraceptive use, number of sexual partners, and HPV score. Adjusted Odd Ratios of adverse events were calculated and presented using a log base 2 scale in a Forest Plot. Null line is indicated for no predictor effects and bolded lines represent adjusted odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals. Bolded lines above and below the null line indicate increased or decreased odds of adverse events, respectively.
Fig 2
Fig 2. HPV score as a predictor of HPV vaccination in multivariate logistic regression (model 1, n = 84).
HPV Score as a predictor of HPV vaccination in a multivariable logistic regression model containing age, race, ethnicity, educational attainment, current contraceptive use, number of sexual partners, and HPV score. HPV Score (p = 0.009) and higher order quadratic term of HPV Score (p = 0.034) are significant predictors of HPV vaccination. Single score changes beyond an HPV score of 16 are not associated with HPV vaccination. Adjusted Odd Ratios of adverse events were calculated and presented using a log base 2 scale in a Forest Plot. Null line is indicated for no predictor effects and bolded lines represent adjusted odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals. Bolded lines above and below the null line indicate increased or decreased odds of adverse events, respectively.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Motivators of HPV vaccination in multivariate logistic regression (Model 2, n = 84).
Motivators of HPV vaccination in a multivariable logistic regression model containing risk perception & vaccine beliefs, healthcare related, and social motivators. Adjusted Odd Ratios of adverse events were calculated and presented using a log base 2 scale in a Forest Plot. Null line is indicated for no predictor effects and bolded lines represent adjusted odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals. Bolded lines above and below the null line indicate increased or decreased odds of adverse events, respectively.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. zur Hausen H. Papillomavirus infections—a major cause of human cancers. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1996;1288(2):F55–78. Epub 1996/10/09. doi: 10.1016/0304-419x(96)00020-0 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dunne EF, Markowitz LE, Saraiya M, Stokley S, Middleman A, Unger ER, et al.. CDC grand rounds: Reducing the burden of HPV-associated cancer and disease. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014;63(4):69–72. . - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lewis RM, Laprise JF, Gargano JW, Unger ER, Querec TD, Chesson HW, et al.. Estimated Prevalence and Incidence of Disease-Associated Human Papillomavirus Types Among 15- to 59-Year-Olds in the United States. Sex Transm Dis. 2021;48(4):273–7. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001356 . - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Szymonowicz KA, Chen J. Biological and clinical aspects of HPV-related cancers. Cancer Biol Med. 2020;17(4):864–78. Epub 20201215. doi: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2020.0370 . - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). QuickStats: Percentage of Adults Aged 18–26 Years Who Ever Received a Human Papillomavirus Vaccine, by Race and Hispanic Origin and Sex—National Health Interview Survey, United States, 2019. MMWR and Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 2021. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances