County-level prevalence estimates of ADHD in children in the United States
- PMID: 36657694
- PMCID: PMC10099151
- DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2023.01.006
County-level prevalence estimates of ADHD in children in the United States
Abstract
Purpose: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common childhood disorder often characterized by long-term impairments in family, academic, and social settings. Measuring the prevalence of ADHD is important as treatment options increase around the U.S. Prevalence data helps inform decisions by care providers, policymakers, and public health officials about allocating resources for ADHD. In addition, measuring geographic variation in prevalence estimates can facilitate hypothesis generation for future analytic work. Most U.S. studies of ADHD prevalence among children focus on national or demographic group rates.
Methods: Using a small area estimation approach and data from the 2016 to 2018 National Survey of Children's Health, we estimated childhood ADHD prevalence estimates at the census regional division, state, and county levels. The sample included approximately 70,000 children aged 5-17 years.
Results: The national ADHD rate was estimated to be 12.9% (95% Confidence Interval: 11.5%, 14.4%). Counties in the West South Central, East South Central, New England, and South Atlantic divisions had higher estimated rates of childhood ADHD (55.1%, 53.6%, 49.3%, and 46.2% of the counties had rates of 16% or greater, respectively) compared to counties in the Mountain, Mid Atlantic, West North Central, Pacific, and East North Central divisions (2.1%, 4%, 5.8%, 6.9%, and 11.7% of the counties had rates of 16% or greater, respectively).
Conclusions: These local-level rates are useful for decision-makers to target programs and direct sufficient ADHD resources based on communities' needs.
Keywords: Childhood attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; County-level; National Survey of Children's Health; Policy; Prevalence; Small area estimation.
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Jan M. Eberth has received consulting fees from the National Network of Public Health Institutes. Alexander C. McLain has received consulting fees from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the World Health Organization. The other authors have no relevant conflicts of interest to disclose.
Figures


References
-
- Allen DM. (1974). The Relationship Between Variable Selection and Data Augmentation and a Method for Prediction. Technometrics, 16(1):125–127.
-
- Anderson MS, Nathaniel J, Neuwirth SJ, Lenardson JD, & Hartley MH. (2010). Patterns of care for rural and urban children with mental health problems. Maine Rural Health Research Center, Working Paper 45.
-
- Banerjee S, Carlin B, Gelfand A. (2004). Hierarchical Modeling and Analysis for Spatial Data. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical