Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May;49(5):325-334.
doi: 10.1136/jme-2022-108291. Epub 2023 Jan 19.

Where is knowledge from the global South? An account of epistemic justice for a global bioethics

Affiliations

Where is knowledge from the global South? An account of epistemic justice for a global bioethics

Bridget Pratt et al. J Med Ethics. 2023 May.

Abstract

The silencing of the epistemologies, theories, principles, values, concepts and experiences of the global South constitutes a particularly egregious epistemic injustice in bioethics. Our shared responsibility to rectify that injustice should be at the top of the ethics agenda. That it is not, or only is in part, is deeply problematic and endangers the credibility of the entire field. As a first step towards reorienting the field, this paper offers a comprehensive account of epistemic justice for global health ethics. We first introduce several different conceptions of justice and decolonisation in relation to knowledge, purposefully drawing on work emanating from the global South as well as the global North. We then apply those conceptions to the global health ethics context to generate a tripartite account of the layers of epistemic justice in the field: who is producing ethics knowledge; what theories and concepts are being applied to produce ethics knowledge; and whose voices are sought, recorded and used to generate ethics knowledge. These layers reflect that the field spans conceptual and empirical research. We conclude by proposing that, going forward, three avenues are key to achieve greater epistemic justice at each layer and to help decolonise global health ethics: namely, understanding the problem, dialogue and structural change.

Keywords: ethics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Comment in

References

    1. Benatar S, Daibes I, Tomsons S. Inter-philosophies dialogue: creating a paradigm for global health ethics. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 2016;26(3):323–46. 10.1353/ken.2016.0027 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tangwa GB. Giving voice to African thought in medical research ethics. Theor Med Bioeth 2017;38(2):101–10. 10.1007/s11017-017-9402-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tosam MJ. African perspectives in global bioethics. Dev World Bioeth 2018;18(3):208–11. 10.1111/dewb.12189 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barugahare J. African bioethics: methodological doubts and insights. BMC Med Ethics 2018;19(1):98. 10.1186/s12910-018-0338-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schuklenk U. Revised CIOMS research ethics guidance: on the importance of process for credibility. Indian J Med Ethics 2017;2(3):169–72. 10.20529/IJME.2017.047 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types