Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jan 18;16(1):121-127.
doi: 10.18240/ijo.2023.01.18. eCollection 2023.

A systematic review of reading tests

Panagiota Ntonti  1 , Christina Mitsi  1 , Eleftherios Chatzimichael  1 , Eirini-Kanella Panagiotopoulou  1 , Minas Bakirtzis  1 , Aristeidis Konstantinidis  1 , Georgios Labiris  1
Affiliations
Review

A systematic review of reading tests

Panagiota Ntonti et al. Int J Ophthalmol. .

Abstract

Adequate near and intermediate visual capacity is important in performing everyday tasks, especially after the introduction of smartphones and computers in our professional and recreational activities. Primary objective of this study was to review all available reading tests both conventional and digital and explore their integrated characteristics. A systematic review of the recent literature regarding reading charts was performed based on the PubMed, Google Scholar, and Springer databases between February and March 2021. Data from 11 descriptive and 24 comparative studies were included in the present systematic review. Clinical settings are still dominated by conventional printed reading charts; however, the most prevalent of them (i.e., Jaeger type charts) are not validated. Reliable reading capacity assessment is done only by those that comply with the International Council of Ophthalmology (ICO) recommendations. Digital reading tests are gaining popularity both in clinical and research settings and are differentiated in standard computer-based applications that require installation either in a computer or a tablet (e.g., Advanced VISION Test and web-based ones e.g., Democritus Digital Acuity Reading Test requires no installation). It is evident that validated digital tests will prevail in future clinical or research settings and it is upon ophthalmologists to select the one most compatible with their examination routine.

Keywords: digital reading chart; low vision chart; paper reading chart; presbyopia; reading acuity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. PRISMA 2020 flow diagram for new systematic reviews.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Choi SU, Chun YS, Lee JK, Kim JT, Jeong JH, Moon NJ. Comparison of vision-related quality of life and mental health between congenital and acquired low-vision patients. Eye (Lond) 2019;33(10):1540–1546. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Senger C, Margarido MRRA, de Moraes CG, de Fendi LI, Messias A, Paula JS. Visual search performance in patients with vision impairment: a systematic review. Curr Eye Res. 2017;42(11):1561–1571. - PubMed
    1. Singh P, Tripathy K. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022. Jan, Presbyopia. 2022 Jul 12.
    1. Fricke TR, Tahhan N, Resnikoff S, Papas E, Burnett A, Ho SM, Naduvilath T, Naidoo KS. Global prevalence of presbyopia and vision impairment from uncorrected presbyopia. Ophthalmology. 2018;125(10):1492–1499. - PubMed
    1. Torricelli AA, Junior JB, Santhiago MR, Bechara SJ. Surgical management of presbyopia. Clin Ophthalmol Auckl N Z. 2012;6:1459–1466. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources