Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Dec 29;30(1):492-505.
doi: 10.3390/curroncol30010039.

Morbidity and Mortality after Surgery for Retroperitoneal Sarcoma

Affiliations
Review

Morbidity and Mortality after Surgery for Retroperitoneal Sarcoma

Samantha M Ruff et al. Curr Oncol. .

Abstract

Retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) is a rare disease with over 100 histologic types and accounts for 10-15% of all soft tissue sarcomas. Due to the rarity of RPS, sarcoma centers in Europe and North America have created the Transatlantic RPS Working Group (TARPSWG) to study this disease and establish best practices for its management. Current guidelines dictate complete resection of all macro and microscopic disease as the gold standard for patients with RPS. Complete extirpation often requires a multi-visceral resection. In addition, recent evidence suggests that en bloc compartmental resections are associated with reduced rates of local recurrence. However, this approach must be balanced by the potential for added morbidity. Strategies to mitigate postoperative complications include optimization of the patient through improved preoperative nutrition and pre-habilitation therapy, referral to a high-volume sarcoma center, and implementation of enhanced recovery protocols. This review will focus on the factors associated with perioperative complications following surgery for RPS and outline approaches to mitigate poor surgical outcomes in this patient population.

Keywords: morbidity; mortality; retroperitoneal sarcoma; surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Retroperitoneal sarcoma wrapped around the infrarenal aorta down to the iliac bifurcation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Retroperitoneal sarcoma encasing the infrarenal aorta.

References

    1. Diamantis A., Baloyiannis I., Magouliotis D., Tolia M., Symeonidis D., Bompou E., Polymeneas G., Tepetes K. Perioperative radiotherapy versus surgery alone for retroperitoneal sarcomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiol. Oncol. 2020;54:14–21. doi: 10.2478/raon-2020-0012. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Munoz P., Bretcha-Boix P., Artigas V., Asencio J.M. Surgical Principles of Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma in the Era of Personalized Treatment: A Review of the Frontline Extended Surgery. Cancers. 2022;14:4091. doi: 10.3390/cancers14174091. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Trans-Atlantic RPS Working Group Management of Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma (RPS) in the Adult: A Consensus Approach From the Trans-Atlantic RPS Working Group. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2015;22:256–263. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3965-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. MacNeill A.J., Gronchi A., Miceli R., Bonvalot S., Swallow C.J., Hohenberger P., Van Coevorden F., Rutkowski P., Callegaro D., Hayes A.J., et al. Postoperative Morbidity After Radical Resection of Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma: A Report from the Transatlantic RPS Working Group. Ann. Surg. 2018;267:959–964. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002250. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wiseman J.T., Ethun C.G., Cloyd J.M., Shelby R., Suarez-Kelly L., Tran T., Poultsides G., Mogal H., Clarke C., Tseng J., et al. Analysis of textbook outcomes among patients undergoing resection of retroperitoneal sarcoma: A multi-institutional analysis of the US Sarcoma Collaborative. J. Surg. Oncol. 2020;122:1189–1198. doi: 10.1002/jso.26136. - DOI - PubMed