Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 3;11(1):9.
doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11010009.

The ACT Predicts Academic Performance-But Why?

Affiliations

The ACT Predicts Academic Performance-But Why?

Alexander P Burgoyne et al. J Intell. .

Abstract

Scores on the ACT college entrance exam predict college grades to a statistically and practically significant degree, but what explains this predictive validity? The most obvious possibility is general intelligence-or psychometric "g". However, inconsistent with this hypothesis, even when independent measures of g are statistically controlled, ACT scores still positively predict college grades. Here, in a study of 182 students enrolled in two Introductory Psychology courses, we tested whether pre-course knowledge, motivation, interest, and/or personality characteristics such as grit and self-control could explain the relationship between ACT and course performance after controlling for g. Surprisingly, none could. We speculate about what other factors might explain the robust relationship between ACT scores and academic performance.

Keywords: ACT; academic achievement; general intelligence; personality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Top panel: SEM with g and the ACT residual predicting post-course knowledge (PCK). Bottom panel: General mediation model used to test whether the ACT residual-academic performance relationship is accounted for by a mediator variable. See Table 6 for parameter estimates for the mediation models.

References

    1. Ackerman Phillip L., Kanfer Ruth. Cognitive, affective, and conative aspects of adult intellect within a typical and maximal performance framework. In: Dai David Y., Sternberg Robert J., editors. Motivation, Emotion, and Cognition. Routledge; London: 2004. pp. 133–56.
    1. ACT Technical Manual. 2017. [(accessed on 20 December 2022)]. Available online: http://www.act.org/content/dam/act/unsecured/documents/ACT_Technical_Man....
    1. Butler Andrew C. Repeated testing produces superior transfer of learning relative to repeated studying. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 2010;36:1118–33. doi: 10.1037/a0019902. - DOI - PubMed
    1. College Scorecard Data. [(accessed on 20 December 2022)]; n.d. Available online: https://collegescorecard.ed.gov/data/
    1. Costa Paul T., McCrae Robert R. Four ways five factors are basic. Journal of Personality and Individual Differences. 1992;13:653–65. doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(92)90236-I. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources