Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 20;24(1):23.
doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-01973-2.

Workload and workflow implications associated with the use of electronic clinical decision support tools used by health professionals in general practice: a scoping review

Emily Fletcher  1 , Alex Burns  2 , Bianca Wiering  2 , Deepthi Lavu  2 , Elizabeth Shephard  2 , Willie Hamilton  2 , John L Campbell  2 , Gary Abel  2
Affiliations

Workload and workflow implications associated with the use of electronic clinical decision support tools used by health professionals in general practice: a scoping review

Emily Fletcher et al. BMC Prim Care. .

Abstract

Background: Electronic clinical decision support tools (eCDS) are increasingly available to assist General Practitioners (GP) with the diagnosis and management of a range of health conditions. It is unclear whether the use of eCDS tools has an impact on GP workload. This scoping review aimed to identify the available evidence on the use of eCDS tools by health professionals in general practice in relation to their impact on workload and workflow.

Methods: A scoping review was carried out using the Arksey and O'Malley methodological framework. The search strategy was developed iteratively, with three main aspects: general practice/primary care contexts, risk assessment/decision support tools, and workload-related factors. Three databases were searched in 2019, and updated in 2021, covering articles published since 2009: Medline (Ovid), HMIC (Ovid) and Web of Science (TR). Double screening was completed by two reviewers, and data extracted from included articles were analysed.

Results: The search resulted in 5,594 references, leading to 95 full articles, referring to 87 studies, after screening. Of these, 36 studies were based in the USA, 21 in the UK and 11 in Australia. A further 18 originated from Canada or Europe, with the remaining studies conducted in New Zealand, South Africa and Malaysia. Studies examined the use of eCDS tools and reported some findings related to their impact on workload, including on consultation duration. Most studies were qualitative and exploratory in nature, reporting health professionals' subjective perceptions of consultation duration as opposed to objectively-measured time spent using tools or consultation durations. Other workload-related findings included impacts on cognitive workload, "workflow" and dialogue with patients, and clinicians' experience of "alert fatigue".

Conclusions: The published literature on the impact of eCDS tools in general practice showed that limited efforts have focused on investigating the impact of such tools on workload and workflow. To gain an understanding of this area, further research, including quantitative measurement of consultation durations, would be useful to inform the future design and implementation of eCDS tools.

Keywords: Consultations; Diagnosis; Electronic clinical decision support; General practice; Risk; Workload.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Search terms
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Summary of the screening process
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Hobbs FDR, Bankhead C, Mukhtar T, Stevens S, Perera-Salazar R, Holt T, et al. Clinical workload in UK primary care: a retrospective analysis of 100 million consultations in England, 2007–14. Lancet. 2016;387:2323–2330. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00620-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baird BCA, Honeyman M, Maguire D, Das P. Understanding the Pressures in General Practice. London: The King's Fund; 2016.
    1. Roland M, Everington S. Tackling the crisis in general practice. BMJ. 2016;352:i942. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i942. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Walker B, Moss C, Gibson J, Sutton M, Spooner S, Checkland K. Tenth National GP Worklife Survey. Manchester: Policy Research Unit in Commissioning and the Healthcare System Manchester Centre for Health Economics; 2019.
    1. Sansom A, Terry R, Fletcher E, Salisbury C, Long L, Richards SH, et al. Why do GPs leave direct patient care and what might help to retain them? A qualitative study of GPs in South West England. BMJ Open. 2018;8:e019849. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019849. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources