Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 13;10(1):158.
doi: 10.3390/children10010158.

Gentle Touch and Sucrose for Pain Relief during Suctioning in Preterm Newborns-A Randomized Clinical Trial

Affiliations

Gentle Touch and Sucrose for Pain Relief during Suctioning in Preterm Newborns-A Randomized Clinical Trial

Nayara Rodrigues Gomes de Oliveira et al. Children (Basel). .

Abstract

Pain management is challenging in neonatal care. We aimed to compare the effects of gentle touch and sucrose on pain relief during suctioning in premature newborns (PTNB). This crossover randomized clinical trial enrolled PTNBs with low birth weight, hemodynamically stable, and requiring suctioning during hospitalization in the neonatal intensive care unit. PTNBs underwent three different suctioning procedures. The first was performed without intervention (baseline). Right after, PTNBs were randomly allocated (sucrose and gentle touch or vice versa) to the next two suctioning procedures. Two validated scales assessed pain: the Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (NIPS) and the Premature Infant Pain Profile-Revised (PIPP-R). We evaluated 50 PTNBs (mean of 28 weeks) with a mean low birth weight of 1050 g; most were under continuous positive airway pressure 37 (74%) and mechanical ventilation 41 (82%). Gentle touch was efficacious for pain relief since NIPS (p = 0.010) compared to baseline. Sucrose was also effective in reducing pain NIPS and PIPP-R (p < 0.001). Although the two interventions reduced pain, no difference was observed between gentle touch and sucrose.

Keywords: gentle touch; interventions; pain; preterm; sucrose.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flowchart. Adapted from CONSORT 2010: extension to randomized crossover trials.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Total NIPS and PIPP-R scores during suctioning procedures (baseline, gentle touch, sucrose).

References

    1. Perry M., Tan Z., Chen J., Weidig T., Xu W., Cong X.S. Neonatal Pain: Perceptions and Current Practice. Crit. Care Nurs Clin. N. Am. 2018;30:549–561. doi: 10.1016/j.cnc.2018.07.013. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Field T. Preterm newborn pain research review. Infant Behav. Dev. 2017;49:141–150. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2017.09.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grupo de Trabajo de Doloren Neonatología, Comité de Estudios Feto—Neonatales (CEFEN) Manejo del dolor en Neonatología [Pain management in Neonatology] Arch. Argent. Pediatr. 2019;117:S180–S194. doi: 10.5546/aap.2019.S180. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Walker S.M. Long term effects of Neonatal Pain. Semin. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;24:1–21. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2019.04.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fitzgerald M. What do we really know about newborn infant pain? Exp. Physiol. 2015;100:1451–1457. doi: 10.1113/EP085134. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources