Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 10;20(2):1265.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021265.

The FRISK (Fracture Risk)-A New Tool to Indicate the Probability of Fractures

Affiliations

The FRISK (Fracture Risk)-A New Tool to Indicate the Probability of Fractures

Florian Wichlas et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Increasing patient inflow into the emergency department makes it necessary to optimize triage management. The scope of this work was to determine simple factors that could detect fractures in patients without the need for specialized personnel. Between 2014 and 2015, 798 patients were admitted to an orthopedic emergency department and prospectively included in the study. The patients received a questionnaire before contacting the doctor. Objective and subjective data were evaluated to determine fracture risk for the upper and lower extremities. The highest risk for fractures in one region was the hip (73.21%; n = 56), followed by the wrist (60.32%; n = 63) and the femoral shaft (4 of 7, 57.14%; n = 7). The regions with the lowest risk were the knee (8.41%; n = 107), the ankle (18.29%; n = 164), and the forearm shaft (30.00%; n = 10). Age was a predictor for fracture: patients older than 59 years had a risk greater than 59.26%, and patients older than 90 years had a risk greater than 83.33%. The functional questions could exclude fractures. Three factors seem to be able to predict fracture risk: the injured region, the patient's age, and a functional question. They can be used for a probatory heuristic that needs to be proven in a prospective way.

Keywords: age; emergency department; fracture risk; functional questions; visual analog scale.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The graph shows the percentage of fractures in groups with increasing age (10-year increments).
Figure 2
Figure 2
The graph shows the VAS values of all patients (total) and the patients with fractures.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Proposed heuristic.

Similar articles

References

    1. Brasseur E., Gilbert A., Servotte J.-C., Donneau A.-F., D’Orio V., Ghuysen A. Emergency Department Crowding: Why Do Patients Walk-In? Acta Clin. Belg. 2021;76:217–223. doi: 10.1080/17843286.2019.1710040. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Frank C., Elmqvist C. Staff Strategies for Dealing with Care Situations at an Emergency Department. Scand. J. Caring Sci. 2020;34:1038–1044. doi: 10.1111/scs.12812. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mirhaghi A., Mazlom R., Heydari A., Ebrahimi M. The Reliability of the Manchester Triage System (MTS): A Meta-Analysis: The Reliability of the MTS. J. Evid. Based Med. 2017;10:129–135. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12231. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ming T., Lai A., Lau P. Can Team Triage Improve Patient Flow in the Emergency Department? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Adv. Emerg. Nurs. J. 2016;38:233–250. doi: 10.1097/TME.0000000000000113. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arya R., Wei G., McCoy J.V., Crane J., Ohman-Strickland P., Eisenstein R.M. Decreasing Length of Stay in the Emergency Department With a Split Emergency Severity Index 3 Patient Flow Model. Acad. Emerg. Med. 2013;20:1171–1179. doi: 10.1111/acem.12249. - DOI - PubMed